Abstract 2102P
Background
It is known that the prevalence of pain in terminal cancer patients reaches 70-90%, and the intensity of pain is very extreme. The intrathecal morphine pump (ITP) has been recognized for effective pain control in cancer pain, but, it is usually recommended to cancer patients with more than one year of life expentancy. This study aimed to find out the usefulness of the ITP through the change in opioid usage before and after pump implantation in patients with terminal cancer.
Methods
A total of 20 patients were included, retrospectively. Morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and pain intensity (visual analogue scale, 0-10) were collected at baseline, 1, and 3months after insertion of ITP. Also, each patient’s demographic data, diagnosis, stage and type of cancer were recorded.
Results
The mean age of 20 patients is 56.2±15.9 (years) and the female was nine. In addition, patients with colorectal, advanced, and prostate cancer accounted for 60% of the patients. The duration of ITP maintenance until the death of patients was 7±10.5 months. The MEDD was increased at 3 months after implantation of ITP compared to baseline (P=0.03). In addition, the pain relief effect lasted at 3 months after the procedure (P=0.03) (Table).
Table: 2102P
Changes in morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and pain intensity after intrathecal morphine pump implantation
Baseline | 1 month after the procedure | 3 months after the procedure | |
MEDD (mg) | 506.7±482.5 | 1131±1227.4 | 858.1±655.81 |
Pain intensity (VAS, 0-10) | 7.5±1.3 | 6.8±3.3 | 5.4±2.51 |
1Statistically significant value compared to baseline (p < 0.05). The values are expressed as the mean ± SD. VAS=visual analogue scale
Conclusions
In patients with terminal cancer requiring high doses of opioids for pain control, the use of ITP implantation can offer effective pain relief while reducing opioid toxicity and side effects. Additionally, clinical evidence suggests that ITP implantation may provide value for patients with a life expectancy of less than one year.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2055P - Multidisciplinary Tumor-ICU Board: Enhancing care for critically Ill patients with solid tumors in the ICU
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 06
2056P - Hospitalization, reconsultations and mortality in the field of oncological emergencies: Who is at higher risk?
Presenter: Eugenia María Martínez Madrid
Session: Poster session 06
2057P - Prevalence of frailty in long-term prostate cancer survivors after radical prostatectomy and its association with quality of life and emotional health
Presenter: Valentin Meissner
Session: Poster session 06
2058P - Reducing waste to improve sustainability and affordability of cancer treatment: Redispensing unused oral anticancer drugs
Presenter: Lisa-Marie Smale
Session: Poster session 06
2059P - The impact of a dental oncology clinic for patients (pts) prescribed bone-modifying agents (BMA) in a cancer centre
Presenter: Harriet Byrne
Session: Poster session 06
2060P - Prevalence and predictor of poor mental adjustment to cancer before lung cancer surgery
Presenter: Junhee Park
Session: Poster session 06
2061P - Network analysis of comprehensive concerns in patients with cancer: Differences between the sexes
Presenter: Kazumasa Yamamoto
Session: Poster session 06
2062P - The psychological distress (PsyD) evaluation in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients (pts): A mono-institutional analysis
Presenter: Maria Bensi
Session: Poster session 06
2063P - Lifestyle changes as cancer treatment: It is time to get specific with our patients
Presenter: Ana Isabel Martin Quesada
Session: Poster session 06
2064P - Hospitalisation of patients with cancer: Identifying points for improvement in patient care in a university hospital in Spain
Presenter: Silvia Roa
Session: Poster session 06