Abstract 2102P
Background
It is known that the prevalence of pain in terminal cancer patients reaches 70-90%, and the intensity of pain is very extreme. The intrathecal morphine pump (ITP) has been recognized for effective pain control in cancer pain, but, it is usually recommended to cancer patients with more than one year of life expentancy. This study aimed to find out the usefulness of the ITP through the change in opioid usage before and after pump implantation in patients with terminal cancer.
Methods
A total of 20 patients were included, retrospectively. Morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and pain intensity (visual analogue scale, 0-10) were collected at baseline, 1, and 3months after insertion of ITP. Also, each patient’s demographic data, diagnosis, stage and type of cancer were recorded.
Results
The mean age of 20 patients is 56.2±15.9 (years) and the female was nine. In addition, patients with colorectal, advanced, and prostate cancer accounted for 60% of the patients. The duration of ITP maintenance until the death of patients was 7±10.5 months. The MEDD was increased at 3 months after implantation of ITP compared to baseline (P=0.03). In addition, the pain relief effect lasted at 3 months after the procedure (P=0.03) (Table).
Table: 2102P
Changes in morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and pain intensity after intrathecal morphine pump implantation
Baseline | 1 month after the procedure | 3 months after the procedure | |
MEDD (mg) | 506.7±482.5 | 1131±1227.4 | 858.1±655.81 |
Pain intensity (VAS, 0-10) | 7.5±1.3 | 6.8±3.3 | 5.4±2.51 |
1Statistically significant value compared to baseline (p < 0.05). The values are expressed as the mean ± SD. VAS=visual analogue scale
Conclusions
In patients with terminal cancer requiring high doses of opioids for pain control, the use of ITP implantation can offer effective pain relief while reducing opioid toxicity and side effects. Additionally, clinical evidence suggests that ITP implantation may provide value for patients with a life expectancy of less than one year.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2116P - Preoperative body mass index, waist circumference, and mortality after major cancer surgery: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea
Presenter: Jiwon Yoon
Session: Poster session 06
2117P - Dietary patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with lung cancer: What needs to change
Presenter: Imanuely Borchardt
Session: Poster session 06
2118P - Refeeding syndrome: A prospective analysis in adults admitted to an oncology hospital
Presenter: Filipe Gonçalves
Session: Poster session 06
2119P - The prognostic impact of nutritional assessment and scores in advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Sara Torresan
Session: Poster session 06
2120P - Nutritional deficiency post gastric cancer surgery
Presenter: Abay Makishev
Session: Poster session 06
2121P - Association between nutritional status and adverse events in gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing outpatient chemotherapy in Japan
Presenter: Naoko Sato
Session: Poster session 06
2122P - Clinical significance of oncology patients’ nutritional status assessment
Presenter: Efthymios Kostaridis
Session: Poster session 06
2123P - Value of immuno-nutritional scores in the prognosis of hospitalised patients with lung cancer
Presenter: Jesús López
Session: Poster session 06
2124P - The impact of NUTRItional status at first medical oncology visit ON Clinical Outcomes: The NUTRIONCO study
Presenter: Maurizio Muscaritoli
Session: Poster session 06
2125P - Potential ROle of hypoVItaminosis D in patiENts with cancer treated with immune ChEckpoint inhibitors (PROVIDENCE): A prospective observational study
Presenter: Alessio Cortellini
Session: Poster session 06