Abstract 2102P
Background
It is known that the prevalence of pain in terminal cancer patients reaches 70-90%, and the intensity of pain is very extreme. The intrathecal morphine pump (ITP) has been recognized for effective pain control in cancer pain, but, it is usually recommended to cancer patients with more than one year of life expentancy. This study aimed to find out the usefulness of the ITP through the change in opioid usage before and after pump implantation in patients with terminal cancer.
Methods
A total of 20 patients were included, retrospectively. Morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and pain intensity (visual analogue scale, 0-10) were collected at baseline, 1, and 3months after insertion of ITP. Also, each patient’s demographic data, diagnosis, stage and type of cancer were recorded.
Results
The mean age of 20 patients is 56.2±15.9 (years) and the female was nine. In addition, patients with colorectal, advanced, and prostate cancer accounted for 60% of the patients. The duration of ITP maintenance until the death of patients was 7±10.5 months. The MEDD was increased at 3 months after implantation of ITP compared to baseline (P=0.03). In addition, the pain relief effect lasted at 3 months after the procedure (P=0.03) (Table).
Table: 2102P
Changes in morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and pain intensity after intrathecal morphine pump implantation
Baseline | 1 month after the procedure | 3 months after the procedure | |
MEDD (mg) | 506.7±482.5 | 1131±1227.4 | 858.1±655.81 |
Pain intensity (VAS, 0-10) | 7.5±1.3 | 6.8±3.3 | 5.4±2.51 |
1Statistically significant value compared to baseline (p < 0.05). The values are expressed as the mean ± SD. VAS=visual analogue scale
Conclusions
In patients with terminal cancer requiring high doses of opioids for pain control, the use of ITP implantation can offer effective pain relief while reducing opioid toxicity and side effects. Additionally, clinical evidence suggests that ITP implantation may provide value for patients with a life expectancy of less than one year.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2065P - Communication on the first medical oncology appointment: What do cancer patients want?
Presenter: Rodrigo Vicente
Session: Poster session 06
2066P - Evaluation of the quality and reliability of ChatGPT and Perplexity's responses about rectal cancer
Presenter: Ozan Yazici
Session: Poster session 06
2067P - Influence of psychiatric disorders on survival in patients with lung cancer: Real-world data
Presenter: Tomi Kovacevic
Session: Poster session 06
2068P - Perspectives and concerns on sexuality among adolescents and young adults treated for testicular germ cell tumour: The PRICELESS-study - A qualitative study
Presenter: Danielle Zweers
Session: Poster session 06
2069P - QoL changes of caregivers during first-line palliative chemotherapy for patients with incurable cancer
Presenter: Nobumichi Takeuchi
Session: Poster session 06
2070P - Assessment of healthy lifestyle habits in breast cancer patients
Presenter: Juan Cristobal Sanchez
Session: Poster session 06
2071P - Identification of top issues and concerns of cancer patients in Korea on social media
Presenter: Joo Han Lim
Session: Poster session 06
2072P - Topical application of mixed agents to reduce oral mucositis during radiotherapy in post operated head and neck cancer
Presenter: Chandra Prakash
Session: Poster session 06
2073P - Medical cannabis: A potential effective treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)
Presenter: Ravit Geva
Session: Poster session 06
2074P - Oral cannabidiol for prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
Presenter: Sebastian Nielsen
Session: Poster session 06