Abstract 1312
Background
Predictive online calculators are used by clinicians as decision aids in early breast cancer (EBC). While use statistics for these calculators have not been published, as of 2017 NHS Predict was being accessed more than 20,000 times a month. These predictive tools have not had accuracy & benefit of use prospectively confirmed in EBC, yet use of calculators has been encouraged in EBC guidelines. It is important to understand the populations informing model development & validation, to understand how data bias may impact predictions in under-represented subpopulations. This work sought to elucidate the risk of bias in model development & validation for 3 online EBC calculators (NHS Predict, Adjuvant! & Cancermath), in an effort to highlight sub-populations where calculated risk & therefore treatment benefit estimates may be less reliable.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, search terms were “predict*” “adjuvant” “breast” & “algorithm”. Results were screened for relevance to the three predictive tools under scrutiny & additional references were extracted from relevant papers. Using a modified CHARMS checklist, the relevant sections of the development & validation papers were extracted.
Results
6 development & 24 validation papers were reviewed as summarised in the TableTable:
264P
Predict | Adjuvant | Cancermath | |
---|---|---|---|
Development population size & date range | 5694 1977-2008 | 37,968 1977-2007 | 499,724 1977-2007 |
Aged <35 in development population | 2% (111) | 0 | >0.5% |
Aged >65 in development population | 32% (1781) | 0 | >17% |
Tumour size >5cm in development population | 5% (287) | 0 | 0 |
Number of validation studies | 10 | 13 | 3 |
% retrospective | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total number of patients in validation studies | 19,864 | 19,618 | 11,203 |
Age >65 in validations | 35% (7134) | 42% (8313) | 40% (4519) |
Age <35 in validations | 16% (3235) | 8% (1518) | 9% (1007) |
Tumour size >5cm in validations | 5% (287) | 5% (1015) | 6% (634) |
Universal exclusions | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy not an exclusion | 1 study (121 patients) | 0 | 0 |
Overall conclusions of validation authors | Earlier versions under-predicted mortality in women <35 Poor performance in tumours >5cm. | Poor performance in general in: <35 and >65 More advanced disease Malay ethnicity Overly optimistic survival predictions across subgroups in UK population. | Poor performance in < 35 Systematically under-predicted mortality, especially for ER-negative tumours. |
Conclusions
All 3 predictive tools have under-represented groups in their development cohorts, specifically those under 35 & over 65 years old, as well as larger tumours. Validation studies consistently demonstrate worse performance in these groups. However, due to inconsistent methodology in validation studies, quantitating the summary performance within & across tools is difficult. These predictive tools should be used with caution in under-represented populations. More work is required to look at clinical utility of tools as well as their statistical performance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3425 - Feasibility and impact of prospective DPYD screening in the Irish population
Presenter: Mohammed Zameer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1972 - Diet-derived metabolites and the risk of colorectal cancer: a nested case-control study in a population-based cohort, the Singapore Chinese Health Study
Presenter: Dawn Chong
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4103 - Loss of subcutaneous adipose tissue during chemotherapy predicts reduced survival in patients with incurable colorectal cancer undergoing palliative therapy
Presenter: Erin Stella Sullivan
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4309 - Obese and overweight is associated with better prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with bevacizumab.
Presenter: Bozena Cybulska-Stopa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3554 - Patient characteristics associated with poor performance status, ECOG 2-3, and effect on survival in 1086 Finnish metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) nationwide (prospective RAXO study)
Presenter: Pia Österlund
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4572 - Discovery and Diagnosis of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in the Real World: Final Results from a European Survey
Presenter: Iga Rawicka
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4783 - Adherence to recommended intake of calcium and colorectal cancer risk in the HEXA study
Presenter: Jeeyoo Lee
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5106 - Body size, sex and sidedness of incident colorectal cancer in a prospective Swedish cohort study
Presenter: Christina Siesing
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3364 - Middle East & North Africa Registry to characterize RAS mutation status and tumor specifications in recently diagnosed patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MORE-RAS Study)
Presenter: Mohamed Oukkal
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3668 - Patient Demographics and Management Landscape of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Third Line Setting: real-world data in an Australian Population
Presenter: Sandy Tun Min
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract