Abstract 1312
Background
Predictive online calculators are used by clinicians as decision aids in early breast cancer (EBC). While use statistics for these calculators have not been published, as of 2017 NHS Predict was being accessed more than 20,000 times a month. These predictive tools have not had accuracy & benefit of use prospectively confirmed in EBC, yet use of calculators has been encouraged in EBC guidelines. It is important to understand the populations informing model development & validation, to understand how data bias may impact predictions in under-represented subpopulations. This work sought to elucidate the risk of bias in model development & validation for 3 online EBC calculators (NHS Predict, Adjuvant! & Cancermath), in an effort to highlight sub-populations where calculated risk & therefore treatment benefit estimates may be less reliable.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, search terms were “predict*” “adjuvant” “breast” & “algorithm”. Results were screened for relevance to the three predictive tools under scrutiny & additional references were extracted from relevant papers. Using a modified CHARMS checklist, the relevant sections of the development & validation papers were extracted.
Results
6 development & 24 validation papers were reviewed as summarised in the TableTable:
264P
Predict | Adjuvant | Cancermath | |
---|---|---|---|
Development population size & date range | 5694 1977-2008 | 37,968 1977-2007 | 499,724 1977-2007 |
Aged <35 in development population | 2% (111) | 0 | >0.5% |
Aged >65 in development population | 32% (1781) | 0 | >17% |
Tumour size >5cm in development population | 5% (287) | 0 | 0 |
Number of validation studies | 10 | 13 | 3 |
% retrospective | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total number of patients in validation studies | 19,864 | 19,618 | 11,203 |
Age >65 in validations | 35% (7134) | 42% (8313) | 40% (4519) |
Age <35 in validations | 16% (3235) | 8% (1518) | 9% (1007) |
Tumour size >5cm in validations | 5% (287) | 5% (1015) | 6% (634) |
Universal exclusions | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy not an exclusion | 1 study (121 patients) | 0 | 0 |
Overall conclusions of validation authors | Earlier versions under-predicted mortality in women <35 Poor performance in tumours >5cm. | Poor performance in general in: <35 and >65 More advanced disease Malay ethnicity Overly optimistic survival predictions across subgroups in UK population. | Poor performance in < 35 Systematically under-predicted mortality, especially for ER-negative tumours. |
Conclusions
All 3 predictive tools have under-represented groups in their development cohorts, specifically those under 35 & over 65 years old, as well as larger tumours. Validation studies consistently demonstrate worse performance in these groups. However, due to inconsistent methodology in validation studies, quantitating the summary performance within & across tools is difficult. These predictive tools should be used with caution in under-represented populations. More work is required to look at clinical utility of tools as well as their statistical performance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5124 - STAR_PAC: Phase I clinical trial repurposing all trans retinoic acid (ATRA) as stromal targeting agent in a novel drug combination for pancreatic cancer.
Presenter: Hemant Kocher
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5257 - Outcomes of First Line FOLFIRINOX (FFX) Versus Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel (GN) in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Multi-Institutional Canadian Sites Experience
Presenter: Neha Papneja
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1166 - Effect of prior cancer on survival outcomes for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Chaobin He
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1169 - Association of combination of irreversible electroporation ablation and chemotherapy with outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a large cohort study
Presenter: Chaobin He
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1222 - Results from phase I study of the oncolytic viral immunotherapy agent Canerpaturev (C-REV) in combination with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yusuke Hashimoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1698 - Multicenter retrospective study of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Masato Ozaka
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2424 - Irinotecan Combined with Oxaliplatin and S1 in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Keke Nie
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2885 - Cancer-associated thrombosis in patients with pancreatic cancer and its correlation with plasma tissue factor level: A Japanese prospective cohort study
Presenter: Satoshi Kobayashi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3702 - A Phase I/Ib, multi-center trial of ARQ-761 (Beta-Lapachone) with gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Muhammad Beg
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5185 - Systemic administration of the hyaluronidase-expressing oncolytic adenovirus VCN-01 in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: first-in-human clinical trial
Presenter: Rocio Garcia-Carbonero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract