Abstract 1312
Background
Predictive online calculators are used by clinicians as decision aids in early breast cancer (EBC). While use statistics for these calculators have not been published, as of 2017 NHS Predict was being accessed more than 20,000 times a month. These predictive tools have not had accuracy & benefit of use prospectively confirmed in EBC, yet use of calculators has been encouraged in EBC guidelines. It is important to understand the populations informing model development & validation, to understand how data bias may impact predictions in under-represented subpopulations. This work sought to elucidate the risk of bias in model development & validation for 3 online EBC calculators (NHS Predict, Adjuvant! & Cancermath), in an effort to highlight sub-populations where calculated risk & therefore treatment benefit estimates may be less reliable.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, search terms were “predict*” “adjuvant” “breast” & “algorithm”. Results were screened for relevance to the three predictive tools under scrutiny & additional references were extracted from relevant papers. Using a modified CHARMS checklist, the relevant sections of the development & validation papers were extracted.
Results
6 development & 24 validation papers were reviewed as summarised in the TableTable:
264P
Predict | Adjuvant | Cancermath | |
---|---|---|---|
Development population size & date range | 5694 1977-2008 | 37,968 1977-2007 | 499,724 1977-2007 |
Aged <35 in development population | 2% (111) | 0 | >0.5% |
Aged >65 in development population | 32% (1781) | 0 | >17% |
Tumour size >5cm in development population | 5% (287) | 0 | 0 |
Number of validation studies | 10 | 13 | 3 |
% retrospective | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Total number of patients in validation studies | 19,864 | 19,618 | 11,203 |
Age >65 in validations | 35% (7134) | 42% (8313) | 40% (4519) |
Age <35 in validations | 16% (3235) | 8% (1518) | 9% (1007) |
Tumour size >5cm in validations | 5% (287) | 5% (1015) | 6% (634) |
Universal exclusions | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male | Multi-focal, inflammatory, male |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy not an exclusion | 1 study (121 patients) | 0 | 0 |
Overall conclusions of validation authors | Earlier versions under-predicted mortality in women <35 Poor performance in tumours >5cm. | Poor performance in general in: <35 and >65 More advanced disease Malay ethnicity Overly optimistic survival predictions across subgroups in UK population. | Poor performance in < 35 Systematically under-predicted mortality, especially for ER-negative tumours. |
Conclusions
All 3 predictive tools have under-represented groups in their development cohorts, specifically those under 35 & over 65 years old, as well as larger tumours. Validation studies consistently demonstrate worse performance in these groups. However, due to inconsistent methodology in validation studies, quantitating the summary performance within & across tools is difficult. These predictive tools should be used with caution in under-represented populations. More work is required to look at clinical utility of tools as well as their statistical performance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2786 - Development of a living organoid biobank derived from colorectal cancer patients: towards personalized medicine
Presenter: Federica Papaccio
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3351 - Microsatellite Instability Detection in Colorectal Cancer: 44-Center Comparison between the Idylla MSI Assay and Routine Molecular and Immunohistochemistry Tests on Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue
Presenter: Xavier Matias-guiu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4901 - Expression profile of EPHB3 and its prognostic significance in colorectal cancer progression (Running head: Prognostic value of EPHB3 in colorectal cancers)
Presenter: Bogun Jang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5030 - A pan-ErbB family inhibitor, AF8c, promotes apoptosis by DR5/Nrf2 activation via ROS in colorectal cancer cells
Presenter: Soyeon Jeong
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5053 - Frequent BRAF, GNAS and SMAD4 mutations identified in Colorectal Mucinous Carcinomas
Presenter: Sun Mi Lee
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5220 - Impact of CCL4 knockout using CRISPR Cas-9 technology on colorectal tumor progression
Presenter: Roba Barakat
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5330 - Independent clinical validation of a gene expression profile to predict benefit of 5-FU in metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Buhl
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5515 - WRN mutated Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is characterized by a distinct molecular and immunological profile
Presenter: Andreas Seeber
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5716 - Mutation analysis of B2M gene in colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite instability
Presenter: Ivana Kašubová
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
870 - Selective Wnt/β-catenin small-molecule inhibitor CWP232228 impairs tumor growth of colon cancer
Presenter: Jin Young Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract