Abstract 133P
Background
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment failure patterns after laparoscopic (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).
Methods
A total of 1792 LAGC patients who underwent radical resection between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into an LG group (n=1557) and OG group (n=235). Propensity score matching was performed to balance the two groups. Dynamic hazard rates of failure were calculated using the hazard function.
Results
A total of 1175 LAGC patients were included after matching (LG group, n=940; OG, n=235). The treatment failure rate of the whole group was 43.23% (508/1175), accounting for 41.38% (389/940) and 50.64% (119/235) in the LG and OG groups, respectively. The static treatment failure pattern showed that only distant recurrence rate of the LG group was significantly lower than that of the OG group (22.02% vs. 28.94%, P=0.025). Landmark analysis showed a lower early treatment failure rate of the LG group in stage Ib-IIIb subgroup (P=0.004). Furthermore, dynamic hazard curve peaked at 9.4 months (Peak rate=0.0186) and then gradually declined. For stage Ⅰb to Ⅲb patients, time of peak failure hazard was 5.2 months earlier in the OG group (OG versus LG: 11.0 versus 16.2 months). Finally, LG was an independent protective factor associated with early treatment failure in stage Ib-IIIb patients (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.93; P=0.019).
Conclusions
Given the differences in treatment failure patterns between LG and OG, shorter-interval surveillance for the first 2 years should be considered for stage Ib-IIIb patients after OG.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Scientific and Technological Innovation Joint Capital Projects of Fujian Province.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
224P - Associations of pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) with treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer: A real-world, population-based study
Presenter: Atul Batra
Session: e-Poster Display Session
225P - Prostate cancer treatments and outcomes in the elderly: A retrospective analysis of an Australian real-world cohort
Presenter: Michael Fernando
Session: e-Poster Display Session
226P - Use of PSMA PET in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Andrew Jensen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
227P - Phase II study of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus enzalutamide for enzalutamide (enza)-resistant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Cohorts (C) 4 and 5 update from KEYNOTE-199
Presenter: Ulka Vaishampayan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
228P - Symptoms and impacts of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) among Japanese patients designated to receive Ra-223
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
229P - Expanding the role of supervised exercise on fatigue in prostate cancer patient receiving androgen deprivation therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
Presenter: Niwanda Yogiswara
Session: e-Poster Display Session
230P - Molecular profiling and clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer
Presenter: Ranlu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
231P - Phase II study of pembrolizumab in docetaxel-pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Updated follow-up of cohorts (C) 1-3 from KEYNOTE-199
Presenter: Jeffrey Goh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
232P - Real-world data on metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide: A regional experience
Presenter: Rachel Raju
Session: e-Poster Display Session
243P - Target sequencing of 508 genes in Chinese epithelial ovarian cancer patients
Presenter: Li Lei
Session: e-Poster Display Session