Abstract 189P
Background
Inflammation-based score such as Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) or Neutrophil -Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with clinical outcome of cancer patients. However, the prognostic value of GPS and NLR for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who received systemic chemotherapy remains unclear.
Methods
We conducted single center retrospective study. Inclusion criteria was defined as patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with FFX or GnP as first line treatment at Hokkaido university hospital between January 2014 and December 2018. Baseline GPS was identified that GPS 0 was CRP ≤1.0 mg/dL and Alb ≥3.5 g/dL, GPS 1 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL or Alb <3.5 g/dL, and GPS 2 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL and Alb <3.5 g/dL. NLR was defined as the ratio of absolute neutrophil count and absolute lymphocyte count. As no clear NLR cutoff level has been established in this setting, we used the cutoff ≧3. Cox-proportional hazards model were used to identify prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results
A total of 101 patients were eligible. Median age of patients was 67, male/female was 63/38, ECOG PS 0/1/2 was 36/62/3, FFX/GnP was 19/82, GPS 0/1/2/unknown was 52/21/23/5, NLR ≧3/<3/unknown was 51/44/6, respectively. In GPS 0/1-2 patients, median PFS were 5.2/2.3months (HR 1.772, 95%CI 1.165-2.693, p=0.007), median OS were 12.4/5.7 months (HR 2.384, 95%CI 1.534-3.706, p<0.001), respectively. In NLR 3≧3 patients, median PFS were 6.4/2.6 months (HR 2.436, 95%C.I. 1.568-3.784, p<0.001), median OS were 14.6/6.0 months (HR 2.496, 95% C.I. 1.616-3.856, p<0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, High NLR (NLR ≧3 vs <3 : HR 2.067, 95%C.I. 1.278-3.343, p=0.003) was significantly associated with poor PFS. For OS, female (HR 2.006, 95%C.I. 1.206-3.34, p=0.007), liver metastasis (HR 2.137, 95%C.I. 1.281-3.565, p=0.004), high NLR (NLR ≧3 vs <3: HR 2.745, 95%C.I. 1.639-4.599, p<0.001), high GPS (GPS 0 vs 1-2: HR 2.016, 95%C.I. 1.233-3.296, p<0.001) were significantly associated with poor OS.
Conclusions
NLR may be better prognosticator than GPS for patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with FFX or GnP.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
H. Nakatsumi: Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Merck Biopharma; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Ono Pharmaceutical. Y. Kawamoto: Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Chudai Pharma; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. S. Yuki: Honoraria (self): Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Sanofi K.K.; Honoraria (self): Bayer Yakuin., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly K.K.; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Chudai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): MSD K.K. N. Sakamoto: Honoraria (self): Gilead Sciences; Honoraria (self): Chudai Pharm; Honoraria (self): Bayer AG; Honoraria (self): Otsuka Pharm; Honoraria (self): Daiichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Astellas Pharma; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Research grant/Funding (self): Gilead Sciences; Research grant/Funding (self): Eisai; Research grant/Funding (self): MSD; Research grant/Funding (self): Otsuka Pharm; Research grant/Funding (self): AbbVie; Research grant/Funding (self): Asuka Pharm. Y. Komatsu: Research grant/Funding (institution): Eisai; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Daiichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Yakult; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Chugai; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Taiho; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Lilly; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Nipro; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Asahikasei; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Nihonkayaku; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Kyowa Kirin; Honoraria (self): Merck Biopharma; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): Shire Japan; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
104P - Safety and efficacy of HLX04 versus reference bevacizumab in combination with XELOX or mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomised, double-blind phase III study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
105P - Prospective, open-label, observational study of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC): The OPTIM1SE study
Presenter: Tsai-Sheng Yang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
106P - Efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and mitomycin-C based concurrent radiotherapy in patients with anal canal cancer
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: e-Poster Display Session
107P - Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the Australian cohort of the phase IIIb, international, open-label, early-access PRECONNECT study
Presenter: Timothy Price
Session: e-Poster Display Session
108P - Comparative analysis of two-stage hepatectomy and enhanced one-stage hepatectomy in the setting of bilobar colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Hayk Torgomyan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
109P - Efficacy and safety of biweekly or triweekly XELOX regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer
Presenter: hangyu zhang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
110P - Analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) effect for colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Wei Zou
Session: e-Poster Display Session
111P - A meta-analysis study on safety and effectiveness comparison between FOLFOX and XELOX regiments on advanced stage colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ida Bagus Budhi
Session: e-Poster Display Session
112P - Pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Asia subgroup results of the phase III KEYNOTE-177 study
Presenter: Takayuki Yoshino
Session: e-Poster Display Session
122P - Nomogram to predict short-term effect of radiotherapy based on pre/post-treatment inflammatory biomarkers and their dynamic changes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Shuai Liang
Session: e-Poster Display Session