Abstract 189P
Background
Inflammation-based score such as Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) or Neutrophil -Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with clinical outcome of cancer patients. However, the prognostic value of GPS and NLR for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who received systemic chemotherapy remains unclear.
Methods
We conducted single center retrospective study. Inclusion criteria was defined as patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with FFX or GnP as first line treatment at Hokkaido university hospital between January 2014 and December 2018. Baseline GPS was identified that GPS 0 was CRP ≤1.0 mg/dL and Alb ≥3.5 g/dL, GPS 1 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL or Alb <3.5 g/dL, and GPS 2 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL and Alb <3.5 g/dL. NLR was defined as the ratio of absolute neutrophil count and absolute lymphocyte count. As no clear NLR cutoff level has been established in this setting, we used the cutoff ≧3. Cox-proportional hazards model were used to identify prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results
A total of 101 patients were eligible. Median age of patients was 67, male/female was 63/38, ECOG PS 0/1/2 was 36/62/3, FFX/GnP was 19/82, GPS 0/1/2/unknown was 52/21/23/5, NLR ≧3/<3/unknown was 51/44/6, respectively. In GPS 0/1-2 patients, median PFS were 5.2/2.3months (HR 1.772, 95%CI 1.165-2.693, p=0.007), median OS were 12.4/5.7 months (HR 2.384, 95%CI 1.534-3.706, p<0.001), respectively. In NLR 3≧3 patients, median PFS were 6.4/2.6 months (HR 2.436, 95%C.I. 1.568-3.784, p<0.001), median OS were 14.6/6.0 months (HR 2.496, 95% C.I. 1.616-3.856, p<0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, High NLR (NLR ≧3 vs <3 : HR 2.067, 95%C.I. 1.278-3.343, p=0.003) was significantly associated with poor PFS. For OS, female (HR 2.006, 95%C.I. 1.206-3.34, p=0.007), liver metastasis (HR 2.137, 95%C.I. 1.281-3.565, p=0.004), high NLR (NLR ≧3 vs <3: HR 2.745, 95%C.I. 1.639-4.599, p<0.001), high GPS (GPS 0 vs 1-2: HR 2.016, 95%C.I. 1.233-3.296, p<0.001) were significantly associated with poor OS.
Conclusions
NLR may be better prognosticator than GPS for patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with FFX or GnP.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
H. Nakatsumi: Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Merck Biopharma; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Ono Pharmaceutical. Y. Kawamoto: Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Chudai Pharma; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. S. Yuki: Honoraria (self): Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Sanofi K.K.; Honoraria (self): Bayer Yakuin., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly K.K.; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Chudai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): MSD K.K. N. Sakamoto: Honoraria (self): Gilead Sciences; Honoraria (self): Chudai Pharm; Honoraria (self): Bayer AG; Honoraria (self): Otsuka Pharm; Honoraria (self): Daiichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Astellas Pharma; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Research grant/Funding (self): Gilead Sciences; Research grant/Funding (self): Eisai; Research grant/Funding (self): MSD; Research grant/Funding (self): Otsuka Pharm; Research grant/Funding (self): AbbVie; Research grant/Funding (self): Asuka Pharm. Y. Komatsu: Research grant/Funding (institution): Eisai; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Daiichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Yakult; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Chugai; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Taiho; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Lilly; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Nipro; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Asahikasei; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Nihonkayaku; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Kyowa Kirin; Honoraria (self): Merck Biopharma; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): Shire Japan; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
133P - Which patient subgroup needs more attention in early treatment failure? A matched cohort study of treatment failure patterns in locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Dong Wu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
134P - Effect of preoperative tumour under-staging on the long-term survival of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Presenter: Mi Lin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
135P - Significance of lymphatic invasion in the indication for additional gastrectomy after endoscopic treatment
Presenter: Hirohito Fujikawa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
136P - Modified ypTNM staging classification for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Wen-Wu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
137P - Clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in resectable gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Mikhail Fedyanin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
138P - Prognostic importance of dynamic changes in systemic inflammatory markers for patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ying-Qi Huang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
139P - An intraoperative model for predicting survival and deciding therapeutic schedules: A comprehensive analysis of peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi-Yu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
140P - Preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein levels predict recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in gastric cancer
Presenter: Li-Li Shen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
141P - Low expression of CDK5RAP3 and UFM1 indicates poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ning-Zi Lian
Session: e-Poster Display Session
142P - Prognostic analysis of patients with intra-abdominal infectious complications after laparoscopy and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis
Presenter: Si-Jin Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session