Abstract 189P
Background
Inflammation-based score such as Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) or Neutrophil -Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with clinical outcome of cancer patients. However, the prognostic value of GPS and NLR for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who received systemic chemotherapy remains unclear.
Methods
We conducted single center retrospective study. Inclusion criteria was defined as patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with FFX or GnP as first line treatment at Hokkaido university hospital between January 2014 and December 2018. Baseline GPS was identified that GPS 0 was CRP ≤1.0 mg/dL and Alb ≥3.5 g/dL, GPS 1 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL or Alb <3.5 g/dL, and GPS 2 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL and Alb <3.5 g/dL. NLR was defined as the ratio of absolute neutrophil count and absolute lymphocyte count. As no clear NLR cutoff level has been established in this setting, we used the cutoff ≧3. Cox-proportional hazards model were used to identify prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results
A total of 101 patients were eligible. Median age of patients was 67, male/female was 63/38, ECOG PS 0/1/2 was 36/62/3, FFX/GnP was 19/82, GPS 0/1/2/unknown was 52/21/23/5, NLR ≧3/<3/unknown was 51/44/6, respectively. In GPS 0/1-2 patients, median PFS were 5.2/2.3months (HR 1.772, 95%CI 1.165-2.693, p=0.007), median OS were 12.4/5.7 months (HR 2.384, 95%CI 1.534-3.706, p<0.001), respectively. In NLR 3≧3 patients, median PFS were 6.4/2.6 months (HR 2.436, 95%C.I. 1.568-3.784, p<0.001), median OS were 14.6/6.0 months (HR 2.496, 95% C.I. 1.616-3.856, p<0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, High NLR (NLR ≧3 vs <3 : HR 2.067, 95%C.I. 1.278-3.343, p=0.003) was significantly associated with poor PFS. For OS, female (HR 2.006, 95%C.I. 1.206-3.34, p=0.007), liver metastasis (HR 2.137, 95%C.I. 1.281-3.565, p=0.004), high NLR (NLR ≧3 vs <3: HR 2.745, 95%C.I. 1.639-4.599, p<0.001), high GPS (GPS 0 vs 1-2: HR 2.016, 95%C.I. 1.233-3.296, p<0.001) were significantly associated with poor OS.
Conclusions
NLR may be better prognosticator than GPS for patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with FFX or GnP.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
H. Nakatsumi: Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Merck Biopharma; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Ono Pharmaceutical. Y. Kawamoto: Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Chudai Pharma; Honoraria (self): Daiichi Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self): Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. S. Yuki: Honoraria (self): Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Sanofi K.K.; Honoraria (self): Bayer Yakuin., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly K.K.; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Chudai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.; Honoraria (self): MSD K.K. N. Sakamoto: Honoraria (self): Gilead Sciences; Honoraria (self): Chudai Pharm; Honoraria (self): Bayer AG; Honoraria (self): Otsuka Pharm; Honoraria (self): Daiichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Astellas Pharma; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Research grant/Funding (self): Gilead Sciences; Research grant/Funding (self): Eisai; Research grant/Funding (self): MSD; Research grant/Funding (self): Otsuka Pharm; Research grant/Funding (self): AbbVie; Research grant/Funding (self): Asuka Pharm. Y. Komatsu: Research grant/Funding (institution): Eisai; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Daiichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Yakult; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Chugai; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Taiho; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Lilly; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Nipro; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Asahikasei; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Nihonkayaku; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Kyowa Kirin; Honoraria (self): Merck Biopharma; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): Shire Japan; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
143P - Lymph nodes metastasis is the most important factor associated with pattern of recurrence following curative resection of gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Fu-Hai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
144P - Clinical implication of DNA damage response gene in patients with stage II or III gastric cancer
Presenter: In Gyu Hwang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
145P - A nomogram for predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer
Presenter: Qing-Zhu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
146P - Red cell distribution width and mean corpuscular volume ratio as a promising new marker for chemotherapy effects in remnant gastric cancer: An analysis of a multi-institutional database
Presenter: Kai-Xiang Xu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
147P - Can the clinical stage of the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification stratify prognosis of patients with Siewert type II/III cancer?
Presenter: Hayato Watanabe
Session: e-Poster Display Session
148P - MCV-the ideal answer to predict the prognosis of remnant gastric cancer: An analysis from a multi-institutional database
Presenter: Kai Weng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
149P - Molecular and clinical characteristics of patients with resectable gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi Zheng
Session: e-Poster Display Session
150P - Real-world assessment of the treatment patterns associated with unresectable advanced and metastatic gastric cancer in China
Presenter: Xiao Sun
Session: e-Poster Display Session
151P - Treatment patterns, healthcare resource use, economic and survival outcomes associated with unresectable advanced metastatic gastric cancers in Taiwan
Presenter: Chee Jen Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
152P - ARID1A deficiency in EBV-positive gastric cancer is partially regulated by EBV-encoded miRNAs, but not by DNA promotor hypermethylation
Presenter: Koji Kase
Session: e-Poster Display Session