Abstract 159P
Background
The stromal component constitutes as much as 90% of pancreatic cancer specimens, dynamically interacting with the tumor and adapting into a pro-survival environment. This poses a clinical challenge, as biopsies often miss cancer by only sampling stroma. By leveraging AI and image analysis, we aim to extract informative cues from stromal interactions for novel cancer biomarker identification. This approach offers the potential for enhanced diagnostic precision and a deeper understanding of pancreatic cancer biology.
Methods
Anonymized digital scans of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis were sourced from the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal. QuPath 0.4.3 aided slide annotation, with subsequent TIF annotation export. Staining normalization was performed via the Mitkovetta technique in Python. Our process involved deep-learning stromal segmentation, prioritizing >95% stromal tiles using Ilastik. Feature extraction was executed utilizing computer vision techniques (Haralick features), alongside the pre-trained and class-trained ImageNet deep-neural network, VGG16.
Results
Our annotated, normalized, automated, and 95% stroma-probability method generated for the training cohort 9829 cancer and 1638 mass-forming pancreatitis tiles, and 10776 cancer and 1211 pancreatitis tiles for the testing set. The table highlights the performance of the classical computer vision approach (Haralicks features extraction in RGB). Furthermore, transferring the ImageNet VGG-16 pre-trained model to our dataset managed to predict the presence of adjacent cancer at 86.6% accuracy. Table: 159P
Training | Validation | |||
Haralicks features | Cancer (N=9829) vs None (N=1638) | P | Cancer (N=10776) vs None (N=1211) | P |
RGB-F2 | +66% | 7.52 X 10-308 | +8.2% | 1.37 X 10-9 |
RGB-F15 | +54% | 3.28 X 10-272 | +8.5% | 8.57 X 10-11 |
RGB F37 | +9.6% | 2.35 X 10-294 | +2.7% | 5.02 X 10-36 |
Conclusions
We demonstrate that normalized stromal tiles could predict the presence of cancer accurately just by their morphological features at HE staining. This highlights the importance of stroma for diagnostic purposes and can serve as the basis for future studies through multiplex imaging and spatial transcriptomics.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Vincent Quoc-Huy Trinh.
Funding
Fonds de Recherche Québec Santé.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract