Abstract 611P
Background
The ESMO-MCBS provides a standardized assessment of the clinical benefit of a study treatment, considering factors such as overall survival and quality of life. We examined the profile of scores for trials of adjuvant therapy or potentially curative therapies presented at ASCO22 to assess the applicability of the MCBS.
Methods
Abstracts and prior or subsequent (until April 10, 2023) full publications of phase 3 trials on adjuvant therapy or curative treatment presented at ASCO22 were assessed using the MCBS v1.1 evaluation form 1. Scores were calculated based on overall survival, disease free survival or pathological complete response data and graded as A, B or C. Grades A and B indicate a substantial magnitude of clinical benefit. Two independent reviewers performed the grading; discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus with a third investigator.
Results
Thirty-five trials were evaluated, of which 11 could not be scored due to insufficient data or endpoint not gradable of the remaining 24 trials, 12 could not be graded due to statistically non-significant results. The remaining 12 trials were scored based on abstract alone (n= 6), or subsequent publication (n=6). A meaningful clinical benefit was seen in 11 of 12 trials (92%) with a score of A (n=9) or B (n=2), whereas 1 study had a score C.
Conclusions
Applying the current ESMO-MCBS to adjuvant and curative phase 3 trials presented at ASCO22 has significant limitations, due to the number of trials not able to be scored. This is a particular problem for studies with non-significant results. Adapting the score to allow grading of all trials may better assist clinicians and patients to assess the value of contemporary research.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
E. Segelov: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: ESMO-MCBS Working Group. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5P - Clinicopathologic features and genomic profiling of occult breast cancer
Presenter: Liansha Tang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
6P - Tumor cell-released autophagosomes (TRAPs) promote lung metastasis through inducing PD-L1 high expression of pulmonary vascular endothelial cells (PVECs) in breast cancer
Presenter: Xuru Wang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
7P - Tumor cell-released autophagosomes (TRAPs) promote breast cancer lung metastasis by modulating neutrophil extracellular traps formation
Presenter: Xiaohe Zhou
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
9P - Clinicopathological features and prognosis of mucinous breast cancer: A retrospective analysis of 358 patients in Vietnam
Presenter: Hoai Hoang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
10P - Comparison of 28-gene and 70-gene panel in risk-prediction of Chinese women with early-stage HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Lei Lei
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
11P - Multimodal analysis of methylation and fragmentomic profiles in plasma cell-free DNA for differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors
Presenter: Hanh Nguyen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
12P - Plasma cell-free mRNA profiles enable early detection of breast cancer
Presenter: Chi Nguyen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
13P - Relationship of distress and quality of life with gut microbiome composition in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: A prospective, observational study
Presenter: Chi-Chan Lee
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
14P - Classification of molecular subtypes of breast cancer in whole-slide histopathological images using a novel deep learning algorithm
Presenter: Hyung Suk Kim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
15P - The regulation of pregnenolone in breast cancer
Presenter: Hyeon-Gu Kang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract