Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
508P - Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 antibody SHR-1210 combined with apatinib in first-line treatment for advanced lung squamous carcinoma: A phase II study
Presenter: Jinliang Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
525P - Retrospective analysis of outcomes of cisplatin and irinotecan combination chemotherapy for unresectable thymic carcinoma
Presenter: Akito Fukuda
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
524P - A study in recurrent small cell lung cancer patients, comparing weekly paclitaxel, irinotecan and temozolomide in second-line: A prospective study from a south Indian tertiary cancer hospital
Presenter: LALATENDU MOHARANA
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
505P - PD-L1 expression in ALK rearranged NSCLC: All questions answered?
Presenter: Amrith B P
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
487P - Afatinib versus gefitinib or erlotinib in first-line setting for Malaysia patients with EGFR mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Chee Shee Chai
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
492P - Feasibility of rebiopsy and sequential treatment of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in real world patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Heekyung Ahn
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
513P - Phase II study of vitamin B12 and folate supplementation for patients undergoing chemotherapy with pemetrexed
Presenter: Shingo Kitagawa
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
493P - Is exon 19 deletion different from exon 21 mutation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A single centre experience
Presenter: Sarita Shrivastva
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
494P - Comparison of pattern of disease progression and prevalence of acquired T790M mutation in Malaysia patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma upon failure of first-line afatinib, gefitinib and erlotinib
Presenter: Chee Shee Chai
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
517P - High BRCA1 expression is independently correlated with decreased overall survival in lung adenocarcinoma: Evidence from meta and bioinformatics analyses
Presenter: Fengzhu Guo
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract