Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
133P - Prognostic and predictive factors from the phase III CELESTIAL trial of cabozantinib (C) versus placebo (P) in previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Thomas Yau
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
134P - Identification, development and validation of a circulating miRNA-based diagnostic signature for early detection of gastric cancer
Presenter: Daisuke Izumi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
135P - The promising key genes associated with tumour microenvironment and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Jing Fang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
136P - Helicobacter pylori-positive gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A subset with distinct prognostic features
Presenter: Yuan Cheng
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
137P - Significant benefit of pyrotinib combined with SHR6390 in patients with multiline-resistant HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Zuhua Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
138P - Incidence of supracarinal lymph node positivity in operated cases of total esophagectomy: Short term results from a tertiary cancer centre
Presenter: Akhil Palod
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
139P - Prognostic usefulness of advanced lung cancer inflammation index in locally-advanced pancreatic carcinoma patients treated with radical chemoradiotherapy
Presenter: Ayberk Besen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
140P - Pancreaticoduodenectomy versus combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pancreaticoduodenectomy: Survival patterns among patients with stage II & III periampullary carcinoma
Presenter: Mai Abdelkader
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
141P - A 13-gene signature of DNA repair predicts prognosis in gastric cancer patients
Presenter: Jinjia Chang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
142P - Relation between Interleukin -4 (590C/T) gene polymorphism and hepatocellular carcinoma risk in HBV and HCV patients
Presenter: Suzy Gohar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract