Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
143P - NOTCH3 expression predicts poor survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell cancers
Presenter: Raja Pramanik
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
144P - Severe hypovitaminosis D in metastatic gastric cancer patients from the Northern and Southern hemispheres: Data from the EXPAND phase III trial
Presenter: Radka Obermannova
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
145P - Role of Glasgow prognostic score in chemo-naïve patients with advanced biliary tract cancer and good performance status
Presenter: Toshikazu Moriwaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
146P - Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of high-quality studies
Presenter: Bin Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
147P - Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
Presenter: Yingtai Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
148P - Efficacy of capecitabine and oxaliplatin versus S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer after D2 lymph node dissection according to lymph node ratio and N stage
Presenter: Seunghwan Lee
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
150P - A Phase Ib Study of IMU-131 HER2/neu peptide vaccine plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2/neu overexpressing metastatic or advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction
Presenter: Yee Chao
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
151P - Gene expression profiling for a better understanding of gastric cancer: From the perspective of metabolic rearrangement
Presenter: Midie Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
152P - Long-term outcomes of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy-based and intensity-modulated radiotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Chia-Lun Chang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
153P - Exosomal LINC00174 facilitates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in residual hepatocellular carcinoma after insufficient radiofrequency ablation by regulating c-JUN/MYCBP/c-Myc axis
Presenter: Dening Ma
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract