Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
117P - Short-term and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation for multiple colorectal liver metastases: A propensity score matching study
Presenter: Wenbai Huang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
119P - The impacts of dose-time-fractionation schedules on pathological complete response rate (pCR) and local recurrence (LR)
Presenter: Fu Jin
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
120P - Platelet to lymphocyte ratio is associated with tumour localization and outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Ahmet Bilici
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
121P - Meta-analysis of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
Presenter: Laiyuan Li
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
127P - Outcomes based on albumin‐bilirubin (ALBI) grade in the phase III CELESTIAL trial of cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Stephen Chan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
128P - Tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for Chinese patients (Pts) with gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Yuxian Bai
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
129P - Monitoring patient-specific mutation in ctDNA and CTC for tumour response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (NCT03425058)
Presenter: Tao Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
130P - Development of a liver cancer risk prediction model for the general population in china: A potential tool for screening
Presenter: Xiaoshuang Feng
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
131P - Cabozantinib in Asian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and other solid tumours: Population pharmacokinetics analysis
Presenter: Chih-Hung Hsu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
132P - Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/levoleucovorin (5 FU/LV) vs 5-FU/LV in Japanese patients (pts) with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPAC)
Presenter: Tatsuya Ioka
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract