Abstract 206P
Background
To compare discriminant ability of risk stratifications for prostate cancer in three authoritative guidelines: National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guideline (NCCN-g), American Urological Association / American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline(AUA-g) and European Association of Urology- European association of nuclear medicine- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- European Society of Urogenital Radiology- International Society of Geriatric Oncology guideline(EAU-g).
Methods
511916 patients with one primary prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, submitted in) database of the National Cancer Institute. Patients were excluded from analysis if < 18 years of age, not adenocarcinoma, diagnosed at autopsy or death certificate only, with an unknown follow-up, incomplete clinical and demographic information, leaving 287333 patients in this cohort. Patients were categorized as different risk stratifications by three latest guidelines (NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g) respectively. Follow-up endpoint was prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM), cutoff date was December 31, 2016. Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) analyses were performed.
Results
The 287333 patients are all from 2004 to 2015. Median follow-up was 69 months (IQR: 39-104). For the three risk stratification modalities, all 6 risk groups in NCCN-g, 5 risk groups in AUA-g and 5 risk groups in EAU-g independently predicted PCSM. NCCN-g yielded 3.1-fold HR differences between low risk group and intermediate risk group, 14.8-fold HR differences between low risk group and high risk group, 33.0-fold HR differences between low risk group and very high risk group, 56.2-fold HR differences between low risk group and regional group, and 148.9-fold HR differences between low risk group and metastatic group. AUC is 0.8332, 0.8309 and 0.7868 in NCCN-g, AUA-g and EAU-g.
Conclusions
This large population-based analysis confirms the better discriminant properties of the risk stratification method in NCCN guideline.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University First Hospital radiation oncology department.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
97P - The role of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the status of surgical margin in rectal cancer
Presenter: Jong Hoon Lee
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
98P - Influence of DPYD*9, DPYD*6 and GSTP1 ile105val genetic polymorphisms on capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) associated toxicities in colorectal cancer patients
Presenter: Ashok Varma
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
99P - Patient-derived tumour model by new culture method leading to the precision medicine
Presenter: Norikatsu Miyoshi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
100P - Clinical impact and carcinogenic mechanism of NCAPG overexpression in colon cancer
Presenter: Kai-Yuan Lin
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
101P - Combined cellular immunotherapy and chemotherapy improves clinical outcome and displays safety in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer
Presenter: Chang Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
102P - Clinical features of anorectal cancer in patients with Crohn’s disease: Japanese single center study
Presenter: Kazuhiro Watanabe
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
103P - Contrast-enhanced CT-based textural parameters as potential prognostic factors of survival for colorectal cancer patients receiving targeted therapy
Presenter: Yanfei Yang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
104P - Prognostic significance of tumour location to the oncologic outcome of colon cancer
Presenter: Sare Hosseini
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
105P - Detection and clinical significance of circulating tumour cells in patients with rectal cancer
Presenter: Shuohui Dong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
106P - The risk of malignization incidence in patients with polyps and polyposis of the colon and rectum
Presenter: Yakov Ten
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract