Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

141P - A 13-gene signature of DNA repair predicts prognosis in gastric cancer patients


23 Nov 2019


Poster display session


Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer


Jinjia Chang


Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix42-ix67. 10.1093/annonc/mdz422


J. Chang1, M. Xu2, W. Li1, H. Sun2, X. Zhu1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032 - Shanghai/CN
  • 2 Department Of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 200032 - Shanghai/CN


Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 141P


DNA repair genes can be used as prognostic biomarkers in many types of cancer. We aimed to identify prognostic DNA repair genes in patients with gastric cancer (GC) by systematically bioinformatic approaches using web-based database.


Global gene expression profiles from altogether 1,325 GC patients’ samples from six independent datasets were included in the study. Clustering analysis was performed to screen potentially abnormal DNA repair genes related to the prognosis of GC, followed by unsupervised clustering analysis to identify molecular subtypes of GC. Characteristics and prognosis differences were analyzed among these molecular subtypes, and modular key genes in molecular subtypes were identified based on changes in expression correlation. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to find the independent prognostic gene. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to estimate correlations of key DNA repair genes with GC patients’overall survival.


There were 57 key genes significantly associated to GC patients’ prognosis, and patients were stratified into three molecular clusters based on their expression profiles, in which patients in Cluster 3 showed the best survival (P < 0.05). After a three-phase training, test and validation process, the expression profile of 13 independent key DNA repair genes were identified can classify the prognostic risk of patients. Compared with patients with low-risk score, patients with high risk score in the training set had shorter overall survival (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, we verified equivalent findings by these key DNA repair genes in the test set (P < 0.0001) and the independent validation set (P = 0.0024).


Our results suggest a great potential for the use of DNA repair gene profiling as a powerful marker in prognostication and inform treatment decisions for GC patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.


This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81602081, 81602078).


All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.