Abstract 479P
Background
Recently, a novel comprehensive marker that represents the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) has been proposed as a more reliable predictor of clinical outcomes. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of PIV and PILE score (a score based on PIV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)), in patients with PCNSL.
Methods
A total of 109 patients were enrolled. PIV was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The PILE score was calculated with the sum of individual values (for PIV < median = 0, ≥ median = 1; for LDH ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN) = 0, > ULN = 1; for ECOG PS < 2 = 0, ≥ 2 = 1). The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. The relationship between PIV, PILE, and therapeutic response was examined.
Results
Pretreatment high PIV was confirmed to be an independent significant factor for overall survival (OS) in univariate (HR 3.990, 95%CI 1.778-8.954, p < 0.001) and multivariate (HR 3.047, 95%CI 1.175-7.897, p = 0.022) analyses. Baseline PIV was also associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). Regarding OS, PIV showed a better predictive performance than other widely used systemic inflammation parameters. Significantly shorter OS and PFS were observed in the high PILE group (median OS: 25.60, 95% CI 15.60-NR vs. NR months, 95% CI 26.10-NR, p = 0.008; median PFS: 26.13, 95% CI 23.30-NR vs. 7.13 months, 95% CI 4.87-NR, p < 0.001). High PILE was associated with primary resistance to therapy (high PILE group: 21/42 patients, 50.00%; low PILE group: 5/45 patients, 11.11%; p < 0.001). A significantly lower response rate to initial treatment was found in patients in the high PILE group (23/42, 54.76%) as compared to patients in the low PILE group (7/45, 15.56%; p < 0.001). PILE was independently associated with therapeutic response to initial treatment (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05–0.46; p < 0.001).
Conclusions
High PIV and high PILE were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in PCNSL patients, indicating that PIV and PILE might be a powerful predictor of prognosis and a potential predictive indicator for treatment response in PCNSL.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
547P - Artificial Intelligence-powered analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Elio Adib
Session: Poster session 16
548P - Simplified immune score based on CD8+ T-cells at the invasive margin provides comparable prognostic value to immune scores in non-metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Durgesh Wankhede
Session: Poster session 16
549P - Combined morphometric immune signatures define the prognosis of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Markus Moehler
Session: Poster session 16
550P - The impact of mismatch repair status on accuracy of clinical staging in upfront resected stage II/III rectal cancer in the Netherlands
Presenter: Renee Lunenberg
Session: Poster session 16
551P - Efficacy prediction of chemoradiotherapy plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment by magnetic resonance imaging in MSS locally advanced rectal cancer
Presenter: Wentao Tang
Session: Poster session 16
552P - Baseline imaging biomarkers to predict outcomes in locally advanced colon cancer (LACC): Data from the FOxTROT international randomised-controlled trial
Presenter: James Platt
Session: Poster session 16
553P - Association of ctDNA-based MRD detection and MRD clearance with short-term overall survival in patients with resectable colorectal cancer: Updated analysis of CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: JUN NAGATA
Session: Poster session 16
555P - Association between copy number aberration and ctDNA MRD in colorectal cancer: CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: TOMOYA HARIMA
Session: Poster session 16