Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 16

479P - The candidate novel markers PIV and PILE score to predict survival outcomes and therapeutic response in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 16

Presenters

Ling Duan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S406-S427. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1587

Authors

L. Duan1, W. Li2, F. Chen2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Neuro-oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100070 - Beijing/CN
  • 2 Neuro-oncology Department, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100070 - Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 479P

Background

Recently, a novel comprehensive marker that represents the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) has been proposed as a more reliable predictor of clinical outcomes. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of PIV and PILE score (a score based on PIV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)), in patients with PCNSL.

Methods

A total of 109 patients were enrolled. PIV was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The PILE score was calculated with the sum of individual values (for PIV < median = 0, ≥ median = 1; for LDH ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN) = 0, > ULN = 1; for ECOG PS < 2 = 0, ≥ 2 = 1). The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. The relationship between PIV, PILE, and therapeutic response was examined.

Results

Pretreatment high PIV was confirmed to be an independent significant factor for overall survival (OS) in univariate (HR 3.990, 95%CI 1.778-8.954, p < 0.001) and multivariate (HR 3.047, 95%CI 1.175-7.897, p = 0.022) analyses. Baseline PIV was also associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). Regarding OS, PIV showed a better predictive performance than other widely used systemic inflammation parameters. Significantly shorter OS and PFS were observed in the high PILE group (median OS: 25.60, 95% CI 15.60-NR vs. NR months, 95% CI 26.10-NR, p = 0.008; median PFS: 26.13, 95% CI 23.30-NR vs. 7.13 months, 95% CI 4.87-NR, p < 0.001). High PILE was associated with primary resistance to therapy (high PILE group: 21/42 patients, 50.00%; low PILE group: 5/45 patients, 11.11%; p < 0.001). A significantly lower response rate to initial treatment was found in patients in the high PILE group (23/42, 54.76%) as compared to patients in the low PILE group (7/45, 15.56%; p < 0.001). PILE was independently associated with therapeutic response to initial treatment (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05–0.46; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

High PIV and high PILE were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in PCNSL patients, indicating that PIV and PILE might be a powerful predictor of prognosis and a potential predictive indicator for treatment response in PCNSL.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.