Abstract 547P
Background
The Immunoscore has been recently proposed for incorporation in the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for gastrointestinal cancers and the WHO classification of tumors of the digestive system. Additionally, responses to immunotherapy vary depending on the burden and location of metastases, with liver metastases portending worse prognosis. Herein, we constructed a deep learning (DL) model to explore immune infiltration status in primary tumors and metastatic specimens from colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods
A fully automated multi-block DL model, named Deep-ICP, was developed, incorporating tissue classification (tumor vs. non-tumor including artifacts), cell detection, and Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) classification. This model was employed on over 10 million image tiles (135 μm x 135 μm) derived from full-face H&E stained images of 2213 CRC patients from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Results
The Deep-ICP model achieved a tumor tissue classification accuracy of 0.96, with precision and recall of 0.95. In the study cohort, 70% (n=1560) had only primary tumors, and 30% (n=653) had metastatic tumors. The TIL density (per mm2) was significantly higher in primary sites, with a median of 668 (Q1=468, Q3=927), compared to metastatic tumors, which had a median of 528 (Q1=358, Q3=751). Among metastatic sites, liver (n=297) metastases exhibited the lowest TIL density with a median of 478 compared to other sites, including bowel (n=1559), lung (n=123), and others (n=233; p-adjust < 0.0001). In a subset of patients with available mismatch repair (MMR) NGS data, 9% (n=89) harbored a deficient phenotype, while 91% (n=855) had a proficient phenotype. TILs were significantly higher in the MMR deficient subgroup independent of specimen site (p-adjust < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that clinical implementation of the Immunoscore may require threshold adjustments based on specimen site and MMR status in CRC. Furthermore, the lower immune infiltration observed in liver metastases could potentially explain the documented poor response to immunotherapy in such tumors, as reported in the literature.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Norwegian Cancer Society.
Disclosure
A. Helland: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, Advisory boards: Janssen, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Pfizer, MSD, Bayer, Lilly, Medicover; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, talks at meetings: AstraZeneca, Roche, Abbvie, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, BMS provides drug to patients in an investigator initiated clinical trial: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Ultimovacs provides drug and funds for investigator initiated clinical trial: Ultimovacs; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, AstraZeneca provides drug and funds for investigator initiated clinical trial: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Roche provides drug and funds for investigator initiated clinical trial: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Novartis provides drug and funds for clinical trial: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Eli Lilly provides drug and funds for clinical stduy: Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Incyte provides drug and funds for clinical stduy: Incyte; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Illumina provides assays for patients in a clinical trial: Illumina; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, GSK provides drug and funds for investigator initiated clinical trial: GSK; Non-Financial Interests, Other, Board member in the patient organisation until 2022. Provides advice and gives talks.: The lung cancer patients organisation. D.J. Kwiatkowski: Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Genentech, AADI, Revolution Medicines; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Role: Genentech, AADI, Expertconnect, Guidepoint, Bridgebio, Slingshot Insights, William Blair, MEDACorp, Radyus Research. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
548P - Simplified immune score based on CD8+ T-cells at the invasive margin provides comparable prognostic value to immune scores in non-metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Durgesh Wankhede
Session: Poster session 16
549P - Combined morphometric immune signatures define the prognosis of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Markus Moehler
Session: Poster session 16
550P - The impact of mismatch repair status on accuracy of clinical staging in upfront resected stage II/III rectal cancer in the Netherlands
Presenter: Renee Lunenberg
Session: Poster session 16
551P - Efficacy prediction of chemoradiotherapy plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment by magnetic resonance imaging in MSS locally advanced rectal cancer
Presenter: Wentao Tang
Session: Poster session 16
552P - Baseline imaging biomarkers to predict outcomes in locally advanced colon cancer (LACC): Data from the FOxTROT international randomised-controlled trial
Presenter: James Platt
Session: Poster session 16
553P - Association of ctDNA-based MRD detection and MRD clearance with short-term overall survival in patients with resectable colorectal cancer: Updated analysis of CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: JUN NAGATA
Session: Poster session 16
555P - Association between copy number aberration and ctDNA MRD in colorectal cancer: CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: TOMOYA HARIMA
Session: Poster session 16
556P - Predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients based on dynamic tumor-informed ctDNA-MRD
Presenter: Weiwei Xiao
Session: Poster session 16