Abstract 549P
Background
During colorectal cancer (CRC) progression, half of all patients develop CRC liver metastasis (CRLM). Perioperative chemotherapy plus targeted therapy translates to high resection and improved survival rates. Still, CRLM are dependent on pathologic tumor staging according UICC System of primary CRC. The genetic and epigenetic background of CRLM defined by microsatellite stability, KRAS/BRAF, CpG-Island-methylator phenotype and immune infiltrates is still under debate as prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Our aim was to assess the prognostic impact of immune responses in CRLM analyzed by complex immune profiling, morphometry and various sequencing techniques.
Methods
227 consecutive patients with FFPE of CRLM resections (2008-2018) and follow-up data from the clinical database were prospectively collected until 2023. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), targeted RNAseq, immunohistochemical staining (IHC) and computerized morphometric models evaluated tumor material for different immune cell types. In-silico analyses were done by network associations. Chemotherapy-naive and treated patients were compared to their outcome.
Results
All CRLM patients with preoperative chemotherapy showed a significant worse OS vs therapy-naïve patients after CRLM surgery (p<0,0001). 113 patients with pretreatment had higher CD8+ Tcell infiltrates (p=0,001) and M2 macrophages (p<0,0001). In the perioperative group, patients with higher M1 macrophage infiltration versus no infiltration (p=0,024) as well as with CD8+ Tcell low-distance to tumor cells versus high distances (p=0,033) had significant better OS. In-silico gene expression analyses of 172 CD8 Tcell+ CRLM had downregulation of cancer-associated genes, and the quality of immune cells was regulated by IFNg immune defense pathways.
Conclusions
In CRLM patients, we defined immune cell infiltrate clusters in responders and non-responders after preoperative chemotherapy. Combined morphometric immune signatures are new prognostic and predictive biomarkers, to identify new specific targets for perioperative therapy, to optimize postoperative follow-up or to plan individualized vaccination strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
MSD.
Disclosure
M. Kloth: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
547P - Artificial Intelligence-powered analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Elio Adib
Session: Poster session 16
548P - Simplified immune score based on CD8+ T-cells at the invasive margin provides comparable prognostic value to immune scores in non-metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Durgesh Wankhede
Session: Poster session 16
550P - The impact of mismatch repair status on accuracy of clinical staging in upfront resected stage II/III rectal cancer in the Netherlands
Presenter: Renee Lunenberg
Session: Poster session 16
551P - Efficacy prediction of chemoradiotherapy plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment by magnetic resonance imaging in MSS locally advanced rectal cancer
Presenter: Wentao Tang
Session: Poster session 16
552P - Baseline imaging biomarkers to predict outcomes in locally advanced colon cancer (LACC): Data from the FOxTROT international randomised-controlled trial
Presenter: James Platt
Session: Poster session 16
553P - Association of ctDNA-based MRD detection and MRD clearance with short-term overall survival in patients with resectable colorectal cancer: Updated analysis of CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: JUN NAGATA
Session: Poster session 16
555P - Association between copy number aberration and ctDNA MRD in colorectal cancer: CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: TOMOYA HARIMA
Session: Poster session 16
556P - Predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients based on dynamic tumor-informed ctDNA-MRD
Presenter: Weiwei Xiao
Session: Poster session 16