Abstract 479P
Background
Recently, a novel comprehensive marker that represents the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) has been proposed as a more reliable predictor of clinical outcomes. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of PIV and PILE score (a score based on PIV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS)), in patients with PCNSL.
Methods
A total of 109 patients were enrolled. PIV was calculated as follows: (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The PILE score was calculated with the sum of individual values (for PIV < median = 0, ≥ median = 1; for LDH ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN) = 0, > ULN = 1; for ECOG PS < 2 = 0, ≥ 2 = 1). The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. The relationship between PIV, PILE, and therapeutic response was examined.
Results
Pretreatment high PIV was confirmed to be an independent significant factor for overall survival (OS) in univariate (HR 3.990, 95%CI 1.778-8.954, p < 0.001) and multivariate (HR 3.047, 95%CI 1.175-7.897, p = 0.022) analyses. Baseline PIV was also associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). Regarding OS, PIV showed a better predictive performance than other widely used systemic inflammation parameters. Significantly shorter OS and PFS were observed in the high PILE group (median OS: 25.60, 95% CI 15.60-NR vs. NR months, 95% CI 26.10-NR, p = 0.008; median PFS: 26.13, 95% CI 23.30-NR vs. 7.13 months, 95% CI 4.87-NR, p < 0.001). High PILE was associated with primary resistance to therapy (high PILE group: 21/42 patients, 50.00%; low PILE group: 5/45 patients, 11.11%; p < 0.001). A significantly lower response rate to initial treatment was found in patients in the high PILE group (23/42, 54.76%) as compared to patients in the low PILE group (7/45, 15.56%; p < 0.001). PILE was independently associated with therapeutic response to initial treatment (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05–0.46; p < 0.001).
Conclusions
High PIV and high PILE were correlated with worse clinical outcomes in PCNSL patients, indicating that PIV and PILE might be a powerful predictor of prognosis and a potential predictive indicator for treatment response in PCNSL.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
556P - Predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients based on dynamic tumor-informed ctDNA-MRD
Presenter: Weiwei Xiao
Session: Poster session 16
557P - Three-year update of real-world evaluation of ColonAiQ for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals
Presenter: Baohua Wang
Session: Poster session 16
558P - Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy based on molecular residual disease detection in resected colorectal liver metastases: Subgroup analysis from CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: Kozo Kataoka
Session: Poster session 16
561P - Liquid biopsy tracking of immunotherapy-induced T cell dynamics in MSS colorectal and endometrial tumors
Presenter: Holger Heyn
Session: Poster session 16
562P - Acquired genomic alterations on first-line chemotherapy (CT) + cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer (mCRC): Circulating tumor (ct)DNA analysis of the randomized phase II trial TIME-PRODIGE-28
Presenter: Valerie Boige
Session: Poster session 16
564P - Short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitor in proficient mismatch repair or microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) low-lying early rectal cancer: Preliminary findings from a prospective, multi-center, phase II trial (TORCH-E)
Presenter: Fan Xia
Session: Poster session 16
565P - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, excision, and observation for early rectal cancer: The phase II NEO trial (CCTG CO.28) results after minimum 3 years follow up
Presenter: Carl Brown
Session: Poster session 16