Abstract 707P
Background
More than 30% of pts with poor prognosis NSGCT will relapse after standard frontline chemotherapy. Unfavourable STM decline may be an early predictor of treatment failure (K.Fizazi, 2014). We aimed to evaluate efficacy of therapy intensification with TIP regimen in this subset of pts.
Methods
This was phase II multicenter prospective trial. We enrolled pts ≥18 years with advanced poor prognosis per original IGCCCG risk groups. All pts received 1 cycle of BEP regimen with tumor markers kinetics assessment on 18-21 d of cycle. Pts with unfavorable STM decline received four cycles of TIP regimen (paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 d 1–2, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 d 2–5 (+mesna), and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 d 2–5 with G-CSF support) with subsequent surgical treatment for pts with resectable disease ≥1 cm. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (48 pts should be included to detect a 20% difference in 1-year PFS (H0 – 55%, H1 – 75%) with two-sided alpha 5% and a power of 80%).
Results
Between 2017 and 2023, 34 pts were enrolled (primary mediastinal – 6 (18%), non-pulmonary visceral metastasis – 19 (56%), 10 (30%) – dose-reduced 1st cycle due to high risks (ECOG 3-4, ultra-high levels of STM)). With median follow-up 21.6 months (4.6–64.9 months) 12 PFS events were observed, local monitoring committee recommended to analyze data preliminary. The 1-year PFS and overall survival were 55% (39–72) and 76% (62–91), respectively. The favorable response rate (complete response (CR) + partial response with negative STM) was achieved in 20 (59.4%) pts. Sixteen (47%) pts underwent surgery following chemotherapy. Pathological CR was achieved in 9 (26%) pts, mature teratoma and viable tumor were observed in 5 (15%) pts in each group postoperatively. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity; febrile neutropenia was observed in 15 (44%) pts.
Conclusions
Compared to historical data the TIP regimen did not improve outcomes of pts with unfavorable decline STM after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Further trials are needed to assess the optimal approach for this subgroup of pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
202P - eIF4E inhibition exhibits anti-tumor activity and re-sensitizes acquired resistant KRAS G12C NSCLC to KRAS inhibitors
Presenter: Andrew Truong
Session: Poster session 09
203P - An innovative evidence-based laboratory medicine (EBLM) test to help doctors in multi-cancer early detection (MCED)
Presenter: Jose D Santotoribio
Session: Poster session 09
204P - Assessing biomarker testing awareness among patients and caregivers in NSCLC through an interdisciplinary global survey
Presenter: Rodrigo Paredes
Session: Poster session 09
205P - Detection and diagnosis of lung cancer by electronic nose analysis of exhaled breath: A multi-center prospective observational study
Presenter: Alessandra Buma
Session: Poster session 09
206P - Unveiling the link: How metabolic syndrome drives endometrial cancer progression
Presenter: Lirong Zhai
Session: Poster session 09
Resources:
Abstract
207P - Associations of diabetic background retinopathy and ER+ breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study
Presenter: Shu Wang
Session: Poster session 09
208P - Role of plasma exosomes in crosstalk between immune system and hereditary ovarian cancer: Opportunity or challenge?
Presenter: Daniele Fanale
Session: Poster session 09
209P - A novel method for early evaluation of drug-specific predictive biomarker
Presenter: Gal Dinstag
Session: Poster session 09
210P - Therapeutic implications of phosphoproteomics in molecular cancer diagnostics
Presenter: Annika Schneider
Session: Poster session 09
211P - GynePDX: A new platform of preclinical models for endometrial and ovarian cancers
Presenter: Melek Denizli
Session: Poster session 09