Abstract 707P
Background
More than 30% of pts with poor prognosis NSGCT will relapse after standard frontline chemotherapy. Unfavourable STM decline may be an early predictor of treatment failure (K.Fizazi, 2014). We aimed to evaluate efficacy of therapy intensification with TIP regimen in this subset of pts.
Methods
This was phase II multicenter prospective trial. We enrolled pts ≥18 years with advanced poor prognosis per original IGCCCG risk groups. All pts received 1 cycle of BEP regimen with tumor markers kinetics assessment on 18-21 d of cycle. Pts with unfavorable STM decline received four cycles of TIP regimen (paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 d 1–2, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 d 2–5 (+mesna), and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 d 2–5 with G-CSF support) with subsequent surgical treatment for pts with resectable disease ≥1 cm. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (48 pts should be included to detect a 20% difference in 1-year PFS (H0 – 55%, H1 – 75%) with two-sided alpha 5% and a power of 80%).
Results
Between 2017 and 2023, 34 pts were enrolled (primary mediastinal – 6 (18%), non-pulmonary visceral metastasis – 19 (56%), 10 (30%) – dose-reduced 1st cycle due to high risks (ECOG 3-4, ultra-high levels of STM)). With median follow-up 21.6 months (4.6–64.9 months) 12 PFS events were observed, local monitoring committee recommended to analyze data preliminary. The 1-year PFS and overall survival were 55% (39–72) and 76% (62–91), respectively. The favorable response rate (complete response (CR) + partial response with negative STM) was achieved in 20 (59.4%) pts. Sixteen (47%) pts underwent surgery following chemotherapy. Pathological CR was achieved in 9 (26%) pts, mature teratoma and viable tumor were observed in 5 (15%) pts in each group postoperatively. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity; febrile neutropenia was observed in 15 (44%) pts.
Conclusions
Compared to historical data the TIP regimen did not improve outcomes of pts with unfavorable decline STM after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Further trials are needed to assess the optimal approach for this subgroup of pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1173P - Combining mass spectrometry with quantitative continuous scoring to unlock the full quantitative potential of immunohistochemistry
Presenter: Ana Hidalgo-Sastre
Session: Poster session 09
1174P - FLAMINGO: Accurate cancer detection from ultra-low-pass whole genome sequencing of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Daan Vessies
Session: Poster session 09
1175P - Universal circulating tumor DNA quantification using deep learning
Presenter: Anders Skanderup
Session: Poster session 09
Resources:
Abstract
1176P - Potential utility of ctDNA to detect false positive PET/CT in the evaluation of lymphoma response
Presenter: Alejandro martín-muñoz
Session: Poster session 09
1177P - FRESH: The Gustave Roussy program to facilitate access to liquid biopsy for precision oncology in France
Presenter: Etienne Rouleau
Session: Poster session 09
1178P - EGFR evaluation in non-small cell lung cancer: An artificial intelligence approach to pre-molecular analysis
Presenter: Chad Vanderbilt
Session: Poster session 09
1179P - WomEC: a novel diagnostic test for the detection of endometrial cancer in uterine fluids
Presenter: Antonio Gil-Moreno
Session: Poster session 09
1180P - An integrated metabolomics-based platform for early-stage detection of multiple cancers
Presenter: imliwati longkumer
Session: Poster session 09
1181P - Diagnostic target product profiles for cancer: A demand signaling tool to stimulate innovation in early cancer diagnosis
Presenter: Sonja Marjanovic
Session: Poster session 09