Abstract 707P
Background
More than 30% of pts with poor prognosis NSGCT will relapse after standard frontline chemotherapy. Unfavourable STM decline may be an early predictor of treatment failure (K.Fizazi, 2014). We aimed to evaluate efficacy of therapy intensification with TIP regimen in this subset of pts.
Methods
This was phase II multicenter prospective trial. We enrolled pts ≥18 years with advanced poor prognosis per original IGCCCG risk groups. All pts received 1 cycle of BEP regimen with tumor markers kinetics assessment on 18-21 d of cycle. Pts with unfavorable STM decline received four cycles of TIP regimen (paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 d 1–2, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 d 2–5 (+mesna), and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 d 2–5 with G-CSF support) with subsequent surgical treatment for pts with resectable disease ≥1 cm. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (48 pts should be included to detect a 20% difference in 1-year PFS (H0 – 55%, H1 – 75%) with two-sided alpha 5% and a power of 80%).
Results
Between 2017 and 2023, 34 pts were enrolled (primary mediastinal – 6 (18%), non-pulmonary visceral metastasis – 19 (56%), 10 (30%) – dose-reduced 1st cycle due to high risks (ECOG 3-4, ultra-high levels of STM)). With median follow-up 21.6 months (4.6–64.9 months) 12 PFS events were observed, local monitoring committee recommended to analyze data preliminary. The 1-year PFS and overall survival were 55% (39–72) and 76% (62–91), respectively. The favorable response rate (complete response (CR) + partial response with negative STM) was achieved in 20 (59.4%) pts. Sixteen (47%) pts underwent surgery following chemotherapy. Pathological CR was achieved in 9 (26%) pts, mature teratoma and viable tumor were observed in 5 (15%) pts in each group postoperatively. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity; febrile neutropenia was observed in 15 (44%) pts.
Conclusions
Compared to historical data the TIP regimen did not improve outcomes of pts with unfavorable decline STM after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Further trials are needed to assess the optimal approach for this subgroup of pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1192P - Optimizing lung cancer screening: Independent verification of an AI/ML computer-aided detection and characterization software as medical device
Presenter: Sylvain Bodard
Session: Poster session 09
1194P - Development of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to detect pulmonary nodules on chest radiography
Presenter: Mitsunori Higuchi
Session: Poster session 09
1195P - Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) screening in Li Fraumeni syndrome for early cancer diagnosis: The SIGNIFIED project
Presenter: Elena Cojocaru
Session: Poster session 09
1196P - Organoid growth-based oncological sensitivity test (OncoSensi) for predicting adjuvant therapy outcomes in ovarian cancer patients
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 09
1197P - Ex vivo basket study reports patient-specific sensitivity to carboplatin versus cisplatin in lung, ovarian and bladder cancer
Presenter: Debbie Robbrecht
Session: Poster session 09
1198P - Analytical validation of an NGS panel-based ecDNA detection device for use as a clinical trial assay for the POTENTIATE clinical study of the novel CHK1 inhibitor, BBI-355
Presenter: Pontis Julien
Session: Poster session 09