Abstract 707P
Background
More than 30% of pts with poor prognosis NSGCT will relapse after standard frontline chemotherapy. Unfavourable STM decline may be an early predictor of treatment failure (K.Fizazi, 2014). We aimed to evaluate efficacy of therapy intensification with TIP regimen in this subset of pts.
Methods
This was phase II multicenter prospective trial. We enrolled pts ≥18 years with advanced poor prognosis per original IGCCCG risk groups. All pts received 1 cycle of BEP regimen with tumor markers kinetics assessment on 18-21 d of cycle. Pts with unfavorable STM decline received four cycles of TIP regimen (paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 d 1–2, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 d 2–5 (+mesna), and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 d 2–5 with G-CSF support) with subsequent surgical treatment for pts with resectable disease ≥1 cm. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (48 pts should be included to detect a 20% difference in 1-year PFS (H0 – 55%, H1 – 75%) with two-sided alpha 5% and a power of 80%).
Results
Between 2017 and 2023, 34 pts were enrolled (primary mediastinal – 6 (18%), non-pulmonary visceral metastasis – 19 (56%), 10 (30%) – dose-reduced 1st cycle due to high risks (ECOG 3-4, ultra-high levels of STM)). With median follow-up 21.6 months (4.6–64.9 months) 12 PFS events were observed, local monitoring committee recommended to analyze data preliminary. The 1-year PFS and overall survival were 55% (39–72) and 76% (62–91), respectively. The favorable response rate (complete response (CR) + partial response with negative STM) was achieved in 20 (59.4%) pts. Sixteen (47%) pts underwent surgery following chemotherapy. Pathological CR was achieved in 9 (26%) pts, mature teratoma and viable tumor were observed in 5 (15%) pts in each group postoperatively. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity; febrile neutropenia was observed in 15 (44%) pts.
Conclusions
Compared to historical data the TIP regimen did not improve outcomes of pts with unfavorable decline STM after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Further trials are needed to assess the optimal approach for this subgroup of pts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
212P - BRGSF-HIS mice as a predictive tool for safety assessment of biologics
Presenter: Kader Thiam
Session: Poster session 09
213P - Constructing a high-definition patient-digital twin (PDT) in treatment-naïve women with advanced cancer
Presenter: Leonardo Garma
Session: Poster session 09
215P - Detection of MUTYH for the prognosis and chemotherapy responsiveness of patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Chi Wai Wong
Session: Poster session 09
216P - β-catenin is a potential prognostic biomarker in uterine sarcoma
Presenter: Ying Cai
Session: Poster session 09
218P - Exploiting a unique glycosaminoglycan for novel pan-cancer therapies and diagnostics
Presenter: Mette Agerbæk
Session: Poster session 09
219P - The landscape and prognostic impact of germline HLA-A subtypes in patients with advanced solid cancers
Presenter: Kyrillus Shohdy
Session: Poster session 09
220P - The role of fucosyltransferase 1 (FUT1) in CRC as a putative prognostic and predictive biomarker
Presenter: Lorenz Pammer
Session: Poster session 09
221P - ANGPTL4's role in cancer: A meta analysis and bioinformatics exploration
Presenter: Osama Younis
Session: Poster session 09
222P - Artificial intelligence (AI) based prognostication from baseline computed tomography (CT) scans in a phase III advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) trial
Presenter: Omar Khan
Session: Poster session 09