Abstract 1760P
Background
Interest of adjuvant imatinib, the standard of care for resected high risk KIT mutated GIST, is unknown for NF1-GISTs. The aim of this study was to determine whether adjuvant imatinib or surveillance had an impact on relapse.
Methods
This retrospective study included consecutive NF1 patients with operated localized GIST, from 2008-2023 in 25 NETSARC+ centers. Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the LogRank test. To address potential bias, a 1:1 propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) matching were performed.
Results
114 patients operated patients were included. Follow up was 6.1 years, median treatment duration was 21 months (IQR 6-36). 50% of patients relapsed in the adjuvant group (AG, n=22) and 6.5% in the surveillance group (SG, n=92). Unmatched analysis of the 10-years relapse free survival (10y-RFS) showed a worse 10y-RFS of the AG: 47.9% (CI95: 23.8-68.6) vs 91.7% (CI95: 80.8-96.5), p<0.001. Groups were similar for gender (p=0.63), age at inclusion (p=0.31), location (intestinal vs gastric, p=0.99), rupture (p=0.16), mutational status (KIT/PDGFRa mutation yes vs no, p=0.20) but different for year of inclusion (p=0.02), largest size (69 vs 48 mm, p=0.03), mitotic count (7 vs 5 mitoses/5mm2, p=0.003), Miettinen high (58.8% vs 12.7%, p<0.001), Joensuu high (90.5% vs 44.8%, p=0.002) and RECKGIST C (40% vs 9.9%, p=0.001) scores. IPTW did not properly match patients, as AG remained of worse prognosis. Best 1:1 matching was only possible for 15 patients of each group. After matching, there was no difference for year of inclusion (p=0.14), location (gastric 13.3% vs 20%, p=0.99), mutational status (KIT/PDGFRa 0% vs 7%, p=0.48), largest size (76 vs 53 mm, p=0.48), mitotic count (8 vs 5/5mm2, p=0.86) and RECKGIST score C (31% vs 20%, p=0.88) for AG and SG respectively. 10y-RFS were similar between both groups (LogRank, p=0.34), 60.0% (CI95: 31.8-79.7) and 67.9% (CI95: 28.2-88.8) respectively.
Conclusions
There was no sign of efficacy of adjuvant imatinib after surgery after matching, consistent with its known low efficacy in non KIT/PDGFRa mutated GIST, strengthening ESMO guidelines to avoid adjuvant treatment in NF1-GIST.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
CHU Amiens Picardie.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V. Hautefeuille: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Merck, Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AAA, Ipsen, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Deciphera, Esteve. B. Verret: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Lilly, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, Owkins, AstraZeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim. S. Watson: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Deeciphera, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Deciphera, Boerhinger Ingelheim. N. Penel: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research grant for clinical trials in sarcoma filed: Bayer HealthCare. F. Ghiringhelli: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, Merck Serono, MSD. M. Muller: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Servier. D. Tougeron: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, MSD, Roche, Servier, Pierre Fabre, BMS, Bayer; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors: Federation francophone de cancerologie digestive. O. Bouche: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Apmonia Therapeutics, Deciphera, Astellas, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Pierre Fabre, Bayer. M. Brahmi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, PharmaMar, Deciphera. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1740P - Surufatinib combined with gemcitabine in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients failed with anthracyclines chemotherapy or monotherapy post-anlotinib progression: A multi-center, phase II trial
Presenter: Yuhong Zhou
Session: Poster session 06
1741P - Ethically-sensitive clinical scenarios in adult patients with sarcomas: A real-world single-institution survey and a classification attempt
Presenter: Paolo G. Casali
Session: Poster session 06
1742P - Factors influencing awareness of patient associations in sarcoma: A multicentric cross-sectional study
Presenter: Pau Mascaró Baselga
Session: Poster session 06
1743P - A phase II study of fruquintinib in the 1L or 2L treatment of unresectable metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
Presenter: Zhiguo Luo
Session: Poster session 06
1745P - How to optimize the response with trabectedin in soft tissue sarcomas? Data from a high-volume center
Presenter: Sebastian Diaz
Session: Poster session 06
1746P - Real-world characterization of patients with advanced or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) in Japan in MASTER KEY project
Presenter: Kenji Tsuchihashi
Session: Poster session 06
1747P - Changes in global health status (GHS) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated with first line palliative chemotherapy: Primary outcomes from the HOLISTIC study
Presenter: Evelyne Roets
Session: Poster session 06
1748P - A prospective, phase II study of tislelizumab administered in combination with eribulin and anlotinib for patients (pts) with advanced adult oft tissue sarcoma (TEASTS)
Presenter: Xi Guo
Session: Poster session 06
1749P - Vertebral MRI in the screening for bone metastasis in myxoid liposarcoma: Is it justified?
Presenter: Tania Moussa
Session: Poster session 06
1750P - Incidence of cardiotoxicity after high cumulative dose of anthracyclines in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Gale Rizzae Mercado Alcala
Session: Poster session 06