Abstract 1760P
Background
Interest of adjuvant imatinib, the standard of care for resected high risk KIT mutated GIST, is unknown for NF1-GISTs. The aim of this study was to determine whether adjuvant imatinib or surveillance had an impact on relapse.
Methods
This retrospective study included consecutive NF1 patients with operated localized GIST, from 2008-2023 in 25 NETSARC+ centers. Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the LogRank test. To address potential bias, a 1:1 propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) matching were performed.
Results
114 patients operated patients were included. Follow up was 6.1 years, median treatment duration was 21 months (IQR 6-36). 50% of patients relapsed in the adjuvant group (AG, n=22) and 6.5% in the surveillance group (SG, n=92). Unmatched analysis of the 10-years relapse free survival (10y-RFS) showed a worse 10y-RFS of the AG: 47.9% (CI95: 23.8-68.6) vs 91.7% (CI95: 80.8-96.5), p<0.001. Groups were similar for gender (p=0.63), age at inclusion (p=0.31), location (intestinal vs gastric, p=0.99), rupture (p=0.16), mutational status (KIT/PDGFRa mutation yes vs no, p=0.20) but different for year of inclusion (p=0.02), largest size (69 vs 48 mm, p=0.03), mitotic count (7 vs 5 mitoses/5mm2, p=0.003), Miettinen high (58.8% vs 12.7%, p<0.001), Joensuu high (90.5% vs 44.8%, p=0.002) and RECKGIST C (40% vs 9.9%, p=0.001) scores. IPTW did not properly match patients, as AG remained of worse prognosis. Best 1:1 matching was only possible for 15 patients of each group. After matching, there was no difference for year of inclusion (p=0.14), location (gastric 13.3% vs 20%, p=0.99), mutational status (KIT/PDGFRa 0% vs 7%, p=0.48), largest size (76 vs 53 mm, p=0.48), mitotic count (8 vs 5/5mm2, p=0.86) and RECKGIST score C (31% vs 20%, p=0.88) for AG and SG respectively. 10y-RFS were similar between both groups (LogRank, p=0.34), 60.0% (CI95: 31.8-79.7) and 67.9% (CI95: 28.2-88.8) respectively.
Conclusions
There was no sign of efficacy of adjuvant imatinib after surgery after matching, consistent with its known low efficacy in non KIT/PDGFRa mutated GIST, strengthening ESMO guidelines to avoid adjuvant treatment in NF1-GIST.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
CHU Amiens Picardie.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V. Hautefeuille: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Merck, Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AAA, Ipsen, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Deciphera, Esteve. B. Verret: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Lilly, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, Owkins, AstraZeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim. S. Watson: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Deeciphera, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Deciphera, Boerhinger Ingelheim. N. Penel: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research grant for clinical trials in sarcoma filed: Bayer HealthCare. F. Ghiringhelli: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, Merck Serono, MSD. M. Muller: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Servier. D. Tougeron: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, MSD, Roche, Servier, Pierre Fabre, BMS, Bayer; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors: Federation francophone de cancerologie digestive. O. Bouche: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Apmonia Therapeutics, Deciphera, Astellas, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Pierre Fabre, Bayer. M. Brahmi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, PharmaMar, Deciphera. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1730P - Preliminary results of phase II study on preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent PARP inhibitor for patients with non-metastatic inoperable or borderline operable extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma
Presenter: NingNing Lu
Session: Poster session 06
Resources:
Abstract
1731P - Phase II study of the CDK2/4/6 inhibitor TQB3616 capsules in patients with dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS)
Presenter: Jing Chen
Session: Poster session 06
1732P - Primary pulmonary sarcoma: A EURACAN project
Presenter: Stephane Collaud
Session: Poster session 06
1733P - Update on gallant: A phase II study using metronomic gemcitabine, doxorubicin and docetaxel plus nivolumab in previously treated sarcoma
Presenter: Neal Chawla
Session: Poster session 06
1734P - Evaluation of nivolumab in cutaneous angiosarcoma management: The ANGIOCHECK study
Presenter: Yasuhiro Fujisawa
Session: Poster session 06
1735P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib in patients with advanced sarcomas (SINANLOSARC): A single-centre, single-arm, phase II trial
Presenter: Zengjun Liu
Session: Poster session 06
Resources:
Abstract
1736P - An open label phase IIa study evaluating the preliminary efficacy of intratumoural tigilanol tiglate (TT) in advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS)
Presenter: Edmund Bartlett
Session: Poster session 06
1737P - A comparison of the risk prediction models sarculator and PERSARC in patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk wall
Presenter: Marthe Kobbeltvedt
Session: Poster session 06
1738P - Results from the conference on challenges in sarcoma (CCS) 2024
Presenter: Christian Rothermundt
Session: Poster session 06
1739P - Linnovate: A phase I/II study of safety/efficacy using lurbinectedin combined with ipilimumab and nivolumab for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (NCT05876715) - Interim analysis of phase I part
Presenter: Erlinda Gordon
Session: Poster session 06