Abstract 1760P
Background
Interest of adjuvant imatinib, the standard of care for resected high risk KIT mutated GIST, is unknown for NF1-GISTs. The aim of this study was to determine whether adjuvant imatinib or surveillance had an impact on relapse.
Methods
This retrospective study included consecutive NF1 patients with operated localized GIST, from 2008-2023 in 25 NETSARC+ centers. Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the LogRank test. To address potential bias, a 1:1 propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) matching were performed.
Results
114 patients operated patients were included. Follow up was 6.1 years, median treatment duration was 21 months (IQR 6-36). 50% of patients relapsed in the adjuvant group (AG, n=22) and 6.5% in the surveillance group (SG, n=92). Unmatched analysis of the 10-years relapse free survival (10y-RFS) showed a worse 10y-RFS of the AG: 47.9% (CI95: 23.8-68.6) vs 91.7% (CI95: 80.8-96.5), p<0.001. Groups were similar for gender (p=0.63), age at inclusion (p=0.31), location (intestinal vs gastric, p=0.99), rupture (p=0.16), mutational status (KIT/PDGFRa mutation yes vs no, p=0.20) but different for year of inclusion (p=0.02), largest size (69 vs 48 mm, p=0.03), mitotic count (7 vs 5 mitoses/5mm2, p=0.003), Miettinen high (58.8% vs 12.7%, p<0.001), Joensuu high (90.5% vs 44.8%, p=0.002) and RECKGIST C (40% vs 9.9%, p=0.001) scores. IPTW did not properly match patients, as AG remained of worse prognosis. Best 1:1 matching was only possible for 15 patients of each group. After matching, there was no difference for year of inclusion (p=0.14), location (gastric 13.3% vs 20%, p=0.99), mutational status (KIT/PDGFRa 0% vs 7%, p=0.48), largest size (76 vs 53 mm, p=0.48), mitotic count (8 vs 5/5mm2, p=0.86) and RECKGIST score C (31% vs 20%, p=0.88) for AG and SG respectively. 10y-RFS were similar between both groups (LogRank, p=0.34), 60.0% (CI95: 31.8-79.7) and 67.9% (CI95: 28.2-88.8) respectively.
Conclusions
There was no sign of efficacy of adjuvant imatinib after surgery after matching, consistent with its known low efficacy in non KIT/PDGFRa mutated GIST, strengthening ESMO guidelines to avoid adjuvant treatment in NF1-GIST.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
CHU Amiens Picardie.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V. Hautefeuille: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Merck, Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AAA, Ipsen, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Deciphera, Esteve. B. Verret: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Lilly, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Seagen, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Novartis, Owkins, AstraZeneca, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim. S. Watson: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Deeciphera, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Deciphera, Boerhinger Ingelheim. N. Penel: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research grant for clinical trials in sarcoma filed: Bayer HealthCare. F. Ghiringhelli: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, Merck Serono, MSD. M. Muller: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Servier. D. Tougeron: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Amgen, MSD, Roche, Servier, Pierre Fabre, BMS, Bayer; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors: Federation francophone de cancerologie digestive. O. Bouche: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Merck, Apmonia Therapeutics, Deciphera, Astellas, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier, Pierre Fabre, Bayer. M. Brahmi: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, PharmaMar, Deciphera. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1362P - Evaluation of imaging-based prognostication (IPRO) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) using deep learning applied to computed tomography (CT)
Presenter: Omar Khan
Session: Poster session 06
1363P - An AI-derived tool to pre-screen lung cancer candidates for clinical trials
Presenter: Mihaela Aldea
Session: Poster session 06
1364P - Federated analysis of overall survival (OS) by location of metastases (mets) in patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) from the Digital Oncology Network for Europe (DigiONE)
Presenter: Åsa Öjlert
Session: Poster session 06
1365P - Does cancer care differ for older adults with lung cancer living with and without Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD)?
Presenter: Lorinda Coombs
Session: Poster session 06
1366P - Natural Language Processing (NLP) as promising artificial intelligence (AI) tool to improve patients (pts) enrollment in clinical trials (CT): Analysis in real-world conditions on a lung cancer cohort
Presenter: Julien Mazieres
Session: Poster session 06
1367P - Sex disparities in patient and tumour characteristics, and overall survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) within the precision oncology era: A Danish nationwide observational study
Presenter: Matilde Frost
Session: Poster session 06
1368P - Correlation between depth of response at 6 months and survival in patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (mNSCLC): SPORE trial
Presenter: Fabien Moinard-Butot
Session: Poster session 06
1369P - Trilaciclib combined with intraventricular injection chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastasis: A prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Shen Cun Fang
Session: Poster session 06
1370P - Survival of de novo metastatic non-small cell lung cancer according to biomarker status in Denmark and Norway: A register-based cohort study
Presenter: Johan Liseth Hansen
Session: Poster session 06