Abstract 1808P
Background
An optimal strategy for second-line treatment in ES-SCLC is undetermined, especially in those previously given immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of immunotherapy retreatment using a PD-1 inhibitor, serplulimab, versus chemotherapy in ES-SCLC after first-line immunotherapy using PD-L1 inhibitors.
Methods
This study included patients with ES-SCLC who experienced progressive disease or discontinuation due to safety after receiving first-line PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy from January 2019 to May 2023. Patients who received other immunotherapy drugs during second-line treatment were excluded. In accordance with the second-line treatment, patients were divided into serplulimab and chemotherapy groups. The former group consisted of patients who received serplulimab, either monotherapy or combination therapy, while the latter group comprised patients who underwent other treatment, such as chemotherapy, angiogenesis drugs and radiotherapy. The outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
Results
This study included 160 patients, of whom 67 were exposed to serplulimab and 93 were exposed to chemotherapy. The reason for discontinuation of first-line immunotherapy was mostly secondary resistance (n=148, 92.5%). The date of the last follow-up was 24 April 2024. PFS was prolonged with serplulimab compared with chemotherapy (median 7.61 vs. 5.60 months, HR 0.251, 95% CI 0.140-0.450, P<0.001), with a comparable ORR (53.7% vs. 40.9%, P=0.107). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed an independent association of second-line serplulimab with prolonged PFS, without any link to first-line immunotherapy. In combination of angiogenesis drugs, Grade ≥3 adverse effects occurred in 17.5% and 16.4% of the patients with serplulimab and chemotherapy, respectively.
Conclusions
In patients with ES-SCLC with disease progression after first-line immunotherapy, immunotherapy retreatment with serplulimab was associated with significantly prolonged PFS compared with chemotherapy, with similar safety profile.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
C. Liu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1781P - Multi-omics of soft tissue sarcomas with complex karyotypes: Investigating genomic and transcriptomic differences between cell lines of the same subtype
Presenter: Miriam Arrulo
Session: Poster session 07
1782P - Assessing the role of denosumab in managing aneurysmal bone cysts: A scoping review
Presenter: Vinesh Sandhu
Session: Poster session 07
1783P - Genetic predisposition in adult sarcoma patients: Beyond TP53
Presenter: Olivia Rohr
Session: Poster session 07
1784TiP - Pasireotide as maintenance treatment in SSTR2/3/5-expressing synovial sarcoma and desmoplastic small round cell tumor: The PAMSARC study
Presenter: Richard Schlenk
Session: Poster session 07
1785TiP - PERELI, a phase II, open label, multicenter study of pemigatinib and retifanlimab in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma
Presenter: Helena Nyström
Session: Poster session 07
1787P - Intracranial response in patients (pts) with baseline (BL) brain metastases (BM) and extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with ifinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) in the IDeate-Lung01 study
Presenter: Melissa Johnson
Session: Poster session 07
1790P - Phase II data of lurbinectedin (LUR) and irinotecan (IRI) in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients (pts) with chemotherapy-free interval (CTFI)>30 days (d)
Presenter: Jon Zugazagoitia
Session: Poster session 07