Abstract 1867P
Background
Infusion of docetaxel carries the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR), prompting the use of dexamethasone (DEXA) premedication to mitigate this risk. However, the appropriate dosage has been a subject of debate. In our study, we investigated the efficacy of a lower dose of DEXA compared to a higher dose in preventing HSR.
Methods
A non-inferiority crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients received either a high dose of DEXA (16 mg/day) from the day before docetaxel infusion until one day after the injection, or a low dose of DEXA (10 mg on the day of docetaxel infusion and 4 mg/day on the two subsequent days). They were cross over to the opposite intervention for the next cycle. The primary endpoint was the proportion of the incidence of HSR between the two groups.
Results
In this trial, 46 patients were enrolled, of whom 43 successfully completed two cycles of chemotherapy. Within the low-dose group, only one event (2.2%) of acute HSR was documented. Logistic regression analysis indicated a slight 2.2% discrepancy in acute HSR rates between the low-dose and high-dose groups (95% CI: -2.0 to 6.4) based on per-protocol analysis. However, the low-dose group failed to meet the non-inferiority threshold of 3%. Regarding delayed HSR, there were 5 occurrences (10.9%) in the low-dose group compared to 1occurrence (2.2%) in the high-dose group. By per-protocol analysis, the low-dose dexamethasone group had a 9.1% higher likelihood of experiencing delayed HSR compared to the high-dose group (95% CI = -1.4 to 19.6).
Conclusions
Premedication with a lower dose of dexamethasone may be less effective in preventing HSR compared to high-dose dexamethasone. However, given the predominantly mild-grade reactions and the low overall incidence of HSR at only 2.2%, the low-dose regimen could still be considered a viable option for individuals needing to minimize high-dose steroid side effects.
Clinical trial identification
TCTR20230713001.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1885P - Serum ATG5 protein may determine chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction in older patients with cancer
Presenter: Ozgur Tanriverdi
Session: Poster session 12
1886P - Expectations and priorities of older patients with cancer: The PRIORITY multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Thomas Grellety
Session: Poster session 12
1887P - Effect of logotherapy on chronic sorrow, dignity, and meaning in life of palliative care patients
Presenter: Yasemin Eskigulek
Session: Poster session 12
1888P - PalliScore: Validation of a rapid scoring system for enhancing decision-making in the Emergency Department for cancer patients in palliative care
Presenter: Rafael Carmo
Session: Poster session 12
1889P - Addressing unmet needs in the management of persistent severe cancer pain: European expert recommendations
Presenter: Mario di Palma
Session: Poster session 12
1890P - End-of-Life (EOL) systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) and health services use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Presenter: Javaid Iqbal
Session: Poster session 12
1891P - The effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists on immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Cho Han Chiang
Session: Poster session 12
1892P - Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists and anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity in hematologic malignancies
Presenter: Cho Hung Chiang
Session: Poster session 12
1893P - Incidence of myocardial ischemia during treatment with capecitabine: Assessment with Holter recording and cardiac biomarkers
Presenter: Anne Dyhl-Polk
Session: Poster session 12
1894P - Pulmonary function test (PFT) and circulating biomarkers in immune-related pneumonitis (irP) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): A real-world multidisciplinary experience
Presenter: Loc Carlo Bao
Session: Poster session 12