Abstract 1867P
Background
Infusion of docetaxel carries the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR), prompting the use of dexamethasone (DEXA) premedication to mitigate this risk. However, the appropriate dosage has been a subject of debate. In our study, we investigated the efficacy of a lower dose of DEXA compared to a higher dose in preventing HSR.
Methods
A non-inferiority crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients received either a high dose of DEXA (16 mg/day) from the day before docetaxel infusion until one day after the injection, or a low dose of DEXA (10 mg on the day of docetaxel infusion and 4 mg/day on the two subsequent days). They were cross over to the opposite intervention for the next cycle. The primary endpoint was the proportion of the incidence of HSR between the two groups.
Results
In this trial, 46 patients were enrolled, of whom 43 successfully completed two cycles of chemotherapy. Within the low-dose group, only one event (2.2%) of acute HSR was documented. Logistic regression analysis indicated a slight 2.2% discrepancy in acute HSR rates between the low-dose and high-dose groups (95% CI: -2.0 to 6.4) based on per-protocol analysis. However, the low-dose group failed to meet the non-inferiority threshold of 3%. Regarding delayed HSR, there were 5 occurrences (10.9%) in the low-dose group compared to 1occurrence (2.2%) in the high-dose group. By per-protocol analysis, the low-dose dexamethasone group had a 9.1% higher likelihood of experiencing delayed HSR compared to the high-dose group (95% CI = -1.4 to 19.6).
Conclusions
Premedication with a lower dose of dexamethasone may be less effective in preventing HSR compared to high-dose dexamethasone. However, given the predominantly mild-grade reactions and the low overall incidence of HSR at only 2.2%, the low-dose regimen could still be considered a viable option for individuals needing to minimize high-dose steroid side effects.
Clinical trial identification
TCTR20230713001.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1895P - Higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in cancer patients at the Emergency Department is associated with an increased risk of hospital admissions
Presenter: Dominikus Huber
Session: Poster session 12
1896P - Importance of prompt medical oncologist (MO) consultation at the Emergency Department (ED): A prospective study in a tertiary hospital on 10,896 admissions in the first quarter of 2024
Presenter: Cristina Morelli
Session: Poster session 12
1897P - Time to access to diagnosis and treatment for lung cancer (LC): Experience within an Italian comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Simone Nardin
Session: Poster session 12
1898P - Efficacy of virtual reality-based interventions in cancer-related symptom management in AYA's: A systematic review
Presenter: Nikolina Dodlek
Session: Poster session 12
1899P - Cannabinoids for cancer-associated symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Ioana Creanga-Murariu
Session: Poster session 12
1900P - Seasonal impact on subcutaneous port infections among oncological patients
Presenter: David Kiesl
Session: Poster session 12
1901P - State of supportive care in oncology 2024: Tumor types, industry support, endpoints, and trial locations
Presenter: David Benjamin
Session: Poster session 12
1902P - Modified Delphi consensus on interventions for radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: A Canadian expert perspective
Presenter: Tarek Hijal
Session: Poster session 12
1904P - Factors and trends associated with alcohol intake in patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Sanjna Rajput
Session: Poster session 12
1905P - Impact of proactive callback in patients with solid tumors receiving systemic therapy: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Jacqueline Savill
Session: Poster session 12