Abstract 1867P
Background
Infusion of docetaxel carries the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR), prompting the use of dexamethasone (DEXA) premedication to mitigate this risk. However, the appropriate dosage has been a subject of debate. In our study, we investigated the efficacy of a lower dose of DEXA compared to a higher dose in preventing HSR.
Methods
A non-inferiority crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients received either a high dose of DEXA (16 mg/day) from the day before docetaxel infusion until one day after the injection, or a low dose of DEXA (10 mg on the day of docetaxel infusion and 4 mg/day on the two subsequent days). They were cross over to the opposite intervention for the next cycle. The primary endpoint was the proportion of the incidence of HSR between the two groups.
Results
In this trial, 46 patients were enrolled, of whom 43 successfully completed two cycles of chemotherapy. Within the low-dose group, only one event (2.2%) of acute HSR was documented. Logistic regression analysis indicated a slight 2.2% discrepancy in acute HSR rates between the low-dose and high-dose groups (95% CI: -2.0 to 6.4) based on per-protocol analysis. However, the low-dose group failed to meet the non-inferiority threshold of 3%. Regarding delayed HSR, there were 5 occurrences (10.9%) in the low-dose group compared to 1occurrence (2.2%) in the high-dose group. By per-protocol analysis, the low-dose dexamethasone group had a 9.1% higher likelihood of experiencing delayed HSR compared to the high-dose group (95% CI = -1.4 to 19.6).
Conclusions
Premedication with a lower dose of dexamethasone may be less effective in preventing HSR compared to high-dose dexamethasone. However, given the predominantly mild-grade reactions and the low overall incidence of HSR at only 2.2%, the low-dose regimen could still be considered a viable option for individuals needing to minimize high-dose steroid side effects.
Clinical trial identification
TCTR20230713001.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1832P - Physical condition is associated with quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: Results from a Portuguese and Spanish cohort of patients
Presenter: Luisa Soares Miranda
Session: Poster session 12
1833P - JUMP_START: Optimization of multiprofessional care for young patients with colorectal cancer
Presenter: Kaiyu Xu
Session: Poster session 12
1834P - Accuracy of recommendations by a conversational Artificial Intelligence (AI) cancer mentor application (app): A multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional evaluation report
Presenter: Talia Golan
Session: Poster session 12
1835P - Multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of digital health cancer solution for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Agnieszka Michael
Session: Poster session 12
1836P - Patient-reported health behaviors (PRHB) among 1850 patients enrolled in a remote patient monitoring (RPM) pathway
Presenter: Maria Alice Franzoi
Session: Poster session 12
1837P - Assessing care complexity in remote patient monitoring (RPM): A cohort study of 2434 cancer patients across 50 sites in France and Belgium
Presenter: Capucine Baldini
Session: Poster session 12
1838P - AI-based smart oncology follow-up system: Prospective application testing and enhancement of clinical efficacy
Presenter: Chunwei Xu
Session: Poster session 12
1839P - Dynamic reporting of treatment related symptoms via ePROs can reversely identify the type of underlying cancer
Presenter: Andreas Trojan
Session: Poster session 12
1840P - Ready for digital health? A national mirror survey exploring the perspectives of both patients and healthcare professionals
Presenter: Florian Scotté
Session: Poster session 12
1841P - Feasibility of wrist-worn health-tracker data to predict the need for therapy modifications in patients with metastatic cancer
Presenter: Anna Sophie Berghoff
Session: Poster session 12