Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 12

1891P - The effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists on immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated cardiotoxicity

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 12

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Cho Han Chiang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1077-S1114. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1612

Authors

C.H. Chiang1, Y. Chang2, K. Chi3, Y. Chang4, C.H. Chiang5, T.G..N. Neilan6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 02138 - Cambridge/US
  • 2 Medicine, Danbury Hospital, 6810 - Danbury/US
  • 3 Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center/ NYC Health & Hospitals/Jacobi, 10461 - Bronx/US
  • 4 Neurosurgery, NCKU - National Cheng Kung University, 701 - Tainan City/TW
  • 5 Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 10048 - Taipei City/TW
  • 6 Medicine, MGH - Massachusetts General Hospital, 02114 - Boston/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1891P

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the survival outcomes of cancer but are also associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists (GLP1a) have been shown to reduce MACE in the non-cancer population; however, there is no data testing whether GLP1a reduces the risk for MACE associated with ICIs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study using the TriNetX Analytics Network database, which contains de-identified data from over 120 participating healthcare institutions. We included all adult cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were treated with an ICI. We matched patients on a GLP1a with patients on non-GLP1a diabetes medications, respectively. We excluded patients with a history of MACE to focus on the role of GLP1a in the primary prevention of MACE. The primary efficacy outcome was MACE, defined as a composite of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and myocarditis and individual components of MACE. The safety outcomes included all-cause mortality and adverse events of special interest that have been associated with the use of GLP1a.

Results

We matched 392 patients on a GLP1a with patients on non-GLP1a diabetes medications. The most common indication for an ICI was lung cancer (24%) and the most commonly used ICI was pembrolizumab (51%). In Cox proportional hazards analyses, GLP1a were associated with a lower risk of MACE (Hazard ratio (HR), 0.33 [95% CI: 0.18-0.63]) and heart failure (HR, 0.38 [95% CI: 0.18-0.79]). Patients on a GLP1a also had a lower rate of all-cause mortality than those on a non-GLP1a (HR, 0.49 [95% CI: 0.36-0.66]) without an increase in safety events. Table: 1891P

Outcomes Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Efficacy outcomes
MACE 0.33 (0.18-0.63)
Heart failure 0.38 (0.18-0.79)
Myocardial infarction 0.20 (0.07-0.58)
Myocarditis 0.47 (0.04-5.20)
Safety outcomes
All-cause mortality 0.49 (0.36-0.66)
Pancreatitis 1.06 (0.36-3.17)
Biliary disease 0.34 (0.15-0.77)
Bowel obstruction 0.48 (0.21-1.08)
Gastroparesis 1.39 (0.23-8.34)

Conclusions

The use of GLP1a was associated with a reduction in MACE, heart failure, and all-cause mortality among cancer patients receiving ICIs without an increase in adverse events.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

T.G.N. Neilan: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Roivant, Roche, Sanofi, Race Oncology, C4 Therapeutics, CardiolRx, and CRC Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Bristol Myers Squibb, Abbott, and AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: National Institutes of Health/NHLBI. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.