Abstract 1867P
Background
Infusion of docetaxel carries the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR), prompting the use of dexamethasone (DEXA) premedication to mitigate this risk. However, the appropriate dosage has been a subject of debate. In our study, we investigated the efficacy of a lower dose of DEXA compared to a higher dose in preventing HSR.
Methods
A non-inferiority crossover randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients received either a high dose of DEXA (16 mg/day) from the day before docetaxel infusion until one day after the injection, or a low dose of DEXA (10 mg on the day of docetaxel infusion and 4 mg/day on the two subsequent days). They were cross over to the opposite intervention for the next cycle. The primary endpoint was the proportion of the incidence of HSR between the two groups.
Results
In this trial, 46 patients were enrolled, of whom 43 successfully completed two cycles of chemotherapy. Within the low-dose group, only one event (2.2%) of acute HSR was documented. Logistic regression analysis indicated a slight 2.2% discrepancy in acute HSR rates between the low-dose and high-dose groups (95% CI: -2.0 to 6.4) based on per-protocol analysis. However, the low-dose group failed to meet the non-inferiority threshold of 3%. Regarding delayed HSR, there were 5 occurrences (10.9%) in the low-dose group compared to 1occurrence (2.2%) in the high-dose group. By per-protocol analysis, the low-dose dexamethasone group had a 9.1% higher likelihood of experiencing delayed HSR compared to the high-dose group (95% CI = -1.4 to 19.6).
Conclusions
Premedication with a lower dose of dexamethasone may be less effective in preventing HSR compared to high-dose dexamethasone. However, given the predominantly mild-grade reactions and the low overall incidence of HSR at only 2.2%, the low-dose regimen could still be considered a viable option for individuals needing to minimize high-dose steroid side effects.
Clinical trial identification
TCTR20230713001.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1717TiP - CARE1 pragmatic clinical trial: First line randomised study platform to optimize treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Laurence Albiges
Session: Poster session 12
1822P - Incidence of cachexia and health resource use (HRU) in patients with breast, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancers
Presenter: Imran Ali
Session: Poster session 12
1823P - Significance of skeletal muscle measurement in cancer-associated cachexia screening
Presenter: Lynn Gottmann
Session: Poster session 12
1824P - Sarcopenia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Clinical impact and its biological correlates
Presenter: Filippo Dall'Olio
Session: Poster session 12
1826P - Risk factors and incidence of osteoporosis in patients with breast cancer according to gender
Presenter: Chang Ik Yoon
Session: Poster session 12
1827P - Bone health and body composition in prostate cancer: An italian consensus about prevention and management strategies
Presenter: Maria Concetta Cursano
Session: Poster session 12
1828P - A cross-sectional study investigating the current diagnostic & therapeutical approaches to bone metastases (BoM) in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Sara Pilotto
Session: Poster session 12
1829P - Nutritional status assessment for patients with common cancer in a cancer hospital of southwest China
Presenter: Huiqing Yu
Session: Poster session 12
Resources:
Abstract
1830P - Comprehensive prognostic effects of inflammatory and nutritional markers to predict survival in women with breast cancer
Presenter: Susanna Hutajulu
Session: Poster session 12
1831P - Obesity and weight variations before treatment, seem to influence weight loss that happens during first-line metastatic lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Anthony Tarabay
Session: Poster session 12