Abstract 1181P
Background
Diagnosing cancer earlier can support timely treatment and improve patient prognosis. Innovative diagnostic tests need to appropriately respond to unmet needs. Target Product Profiles (TPPs) are specification documents that serve as demand-signalling tools to inform developing improved tests – in terms of scientific performance, fit with clinical pathways and patient needs. There is growing interest in their use. Commissioned by Cancer Research UK, RAND Europe and the Office of Health Economics conducted a study to establish a methodological process for developing robust diagnostic TPPs for cancer and identify the types of features TPPs should consider.
Methods
A mixed-methods approach combined international literature review, interviews, workshops with UK experts and developing an economic modelling tool for TPP requirements. 129 individuals contributed (academics, funders, healthcare professionals, industry, policy, regulatory and HTA experts, health economists, and patient and public voice).
Results
Establishing specifications for combinations of core features driving a test’s value is key to TPP development. Trade-offs between different requirements must be considered. Relevant features types fall into 9 categories (e.g. unmet need, analytical performance, clinical validity, clinical utility, human factors, infrastructure, cost/economic, regulation, environmental). Fit-for-purpose TPPs require input from diverse stakeholders through desk research, consultation and modelling methods. TPP development has 2 stages: inception (establishing core working group, governance, action plan) and implementation (scoping unmet need and key test requirements, TPP drafting, consensus building).
Conclusions
This internationally-relevant, tumour-site agnostic guide is an evidence-based resource for designing TPPs for specific cancer tests and use cases. It highlights multifaceted factors and practical tips for deciding which features to consider and methods to use in TPP development. Robust TPPs are an important tool for developing improved cancer diagnostic tests, but need to align with wider innovation and health system efforts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
RAND Europe; Cancer Research UK.
Funding
Cancer Research UK.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
845TiP - CNS lymphoma imaging and molecular biomarkers study: CLIMB
Presenter: Panagiotis Ntellas
Session: Poster session 09
1173P - Combining mass spectrometry with quantitative continuous scoring to unlock the full quantitative potential of immunohistochemistry
Presenter: Ana Hidalgo-Sastre
Session: Poster session 09
1174P - FLAMINGO: Accurate cancer detection from ultra-low-pass whole genome sequencing of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Daan Vessies
Session: Poster session 09
1175P - Universal circulating tumor DNA quantification using deep learning
Presenter: Anders Skanderup
Session: Poster session 09
Resources:
Abstract
1176P - Potential utility of ctDNA to detect false positive PET/CT in the evaluation of lymphoma response
Presenter: Alejandro martín-muñoz
Session: Poster session 09
1177P - FRESH: The Gustave Roussy program to facilitate access to liquid biopsy for precision oncology in France
Presenter: Etienne Rouleau
Session: Poster session 09
1178P - EGFR evaluation in non-small cell lung cancer: An artificial intelligence approach to pre-molecular analysis
Presenter: Chad Vanderbilt
Session: Poster session 09
1179P - WomEC: a novel diagnostic test for the detection of endometrial cancer in uterine fluids
Presenter: Antonio Gil-Moreno
Session: Poster session 09
1180P - An integrated metabolomics-based platform for early-stage detection of multiple cancers
Presenter: imliwati longkumer
Session: Poster session 09