Abstract 1181P
Background
Diagnosing cancer earlier can support timely treatment and improve patient prognosis. Innovative diagnostic tests need to appropriately respond to unmet needs. Target Product Profiles (TPPs) are specification documents that serve as demand-signalling tools to inform developing improved tests – in terms of scientific performance, fit with clinical pathways and patient needs. There is growing interest in their use. Commissioned by Cancer Research UK, RAND Europe and the Office of Health Economics conducted a study to establish a methodological process for developing robust diagnostic TPPs for cancer and identify the types of features TPPs should consider.
Methods
A mixed-methods approach combined international literature review, interviews, workshops with UK experts and developing an economic modelling tool for TPP requirements. 129 individuals contributed (academics, funders, healthcare professionals, industry, policy, regulatory and HTA experts, health economists, and patient and public voice).
Results
Establishing specifications for combinations of core features driving a test’s value is key to TPP development. Trade-offs between different requirements must be considered. Relevant features types fall into 9 categories (e.g. unmet need, analytical performance, clinical validity, clinical utility, human factors, infrastructure, cost/economic, regulation, environmental). Fit-for-purpose TPPs require input from diverse stakeholders through desk research, consultation and modelling methods. TPP development has 2 stages: inception (establishing core working group, governance, action plan) and implementation (scoping unmet need and key test requirements, TPP drafting, consensus building).
Conclusions
This internationally-relevant, tumour-site agnostic guide is an evidence-based resource for designing TPPs for specific cancer tests and use cases. It highlights multifaceted factors and practical tips for deciding which features to consider and methods to use in TPP development. Robust TPPs are an important tool for developing improved cancer diagnostic tests, but need to align with wider innovation and health system efforts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
RAND Europe; Cancer Research UK.
Funding
Cancer Research UK.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
202P - eIF4E inhibition exhibits anti-tumor activity and re-sensitizes acquired resistant KRAS G12C NSCLC to KRAS inhibitors
Presenter: Andrew Truong
Session: Poster session 09
203P - An innovative evidence-based laboratory medicine (EBLM) test to help doctors in multi-cancer early detection (MCED)
Presenter: Jose D Santotoribio
Session: Poster session 09
204P - Assessing biomarker testing awareness among patients and caregivers in NSCLC through an interdisciplinary global survey
Presenter: Rodrigo Paredes
Session: Poster session 09
205P - Detection and diagnosis of lung cancer by electronic nose analysis of exhaled breath: A multi-center prospective observational study
Presenter: Alessandra Buma
Session: Poster session 09
206P - Unveiling the link: How metabolic syndrome drives endometrial cancer progression
Presenter: Lirong Zhai
Session: Poster session 09
Resources:
Abstract
207P - Associations of diabetic background retinopathy and ER+ breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study
Presenter: Shu Wang
Session: Poster session 09
208P - Role of plasma exosomes in crosstalk between immune system and hereditary ovarian cancer: Opportunity or challenge?
Presenter: Daniele Fanale
Session: Poster session 09
209P - A novel method for early evaluation of drug-specific predictive biomarker
Presenter: Gal Dinstag
Session: Poster session 09
210P - Therapeutic implications of phosphoproteomics in molecular cancer diagnostics
Presenter: Annika Schneider
Session: Poster session 09
211P - GynePDX: A new platform of preclinical models for endometrial and ovarian cancers
Presenter: Melek Denizli
Session: Poster session 09