Abstract 1181P
Background
Diagnosing cancer earlier can support timely treatment and improve patient prognosis. Innovative diagnostic tests need to appropriately respond to unmet needs. Target Product Profiles (TPPs) are specification documents that serve as demand-signalling tools to inform developing improved tests – in terms of scientific performance, fit with clinical pathways and patient needs. There is growing interest in their use. Commissioned by Cancer Research UK, RAND Europe and the Office of Health Economics conducted a study to establish a methodological process for developing robust diagnostic TPPs for cancer and identify the types of features TPPs should consider.
Methods
A mixed-methods approach combined international literature review, interviews, workshops with UK experts and developing an economic modelling tool for TPP requirements. 129 individuals contributed (academics, funders, healthcare professionals, industry, policy, regulatory and HTA experts, health economists, and patient and public voice).
Results
Establishing specifications for combinations of core features driving a test’s value is key to TPP development. Trade-offs between different requirements must be considered. Relevant features types fall into 9 categories (e.g. unmet need, analytical performance, clinical validity, clinical utility, human factors, infrastructure, cost/economic, regulation, environmental). Fit-for-purpose TPPs require input from diverse stakeholders through desk research, consultation and modelling methods. TPP development has 2 stages: inception (establishing core working group, governance, action plan) and implementation (scoping unmet need and key test requirements, TPP drafting, consensus building).
Conclusions
This internationally-relevant, tumour-site agnostic guide is an evidence-based resource for designing TPPs for specific cancer tests and use cases. It highlights multifaceted factors and practical tips for deciding which features to consider and methods to use in TPP development. Robust TPPs are an important tool for developing improved cancer diagnostic tests, but need to align with wider innovation and health system efforts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
RAND Europe; Cancer Research UK.
Funding
Cancer Research UK.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1192P - Optimizing lung cancer screening: Independent verification of an AI/ML computer-aided detection and characterization software as medical device
Presenter: Sylvain Bodard
Session: Poster session 09
1194P - Development of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to detect pulmonary nodules on chest radiography
Presenter: Mitsunori Higuchi
Session: Poster session 09
1195P - Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) screening in Li Fraumeni syndrome for early cancer diagnosis: The SIGNIFIED project
Presenter: Elena Cojocaru
Session: Poster session 09
1196P - Organoid growth-based oncological sensitivity test (OncoSensi) for predicting adjuvant therapy outcomes in ovarian cancer patients
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 09
1197P - Ex vivo basket study reports patient-specific sensitivity to carboplatin versus cisplatin in lung, ovarian and bladder cancer
Presenter: Debbie Robbrecht
Session: Poster session 09
1198P - Analytical validation of an NGS panel-based ecDNA detection device for use as a clinical trial assay for the POTENTIATE clinical study of the novel CHK1 inhibitor, BBI-355
Presenter: Pontis Julien
Session: Poster session 09