Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 09

1181P - Diagnostic target product profiles for cancer: A demand signaling tool to stimulate innovation in early cancer diagnosis

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 09

Topics

Laboratory Diagnostics;  Cancer Care Equity Principles and Health Economics;  Cancer Research

Tumour Site

Presenters

Sonja Marjanovic

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S762-S774. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1599

Authors

S. Marjanovic1, M.L. Cabling2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Health And Wellbeing, RAND Europe, CB2 8BF - Cambridge/GB
  • 2 Health And Wellbeing, RAND Europe, CB4 1YG - Teams/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1181P

Background

Diagnosing cancer earlier can support timely treatment and improve patient prognosis. Innovative diagnostic tests need to appropriately respond to unmet needs. Target Product Profiles (TPPs) are specification documents that serve as demand-signalling tools to inform developing improved tests – in terms of scientific performance, fit with clinical pathways and patient needs. There is growing interest in their use. Commissioned by Cancer Research UK, RAND Europe and the Office of Health Economics conducted a study to establish a methodological process for developing robust diagnostic TPPs for cancer and identify the types of features TPPs should consider.

Methods

A mixed-methods approach combined international literature review, interviews, workshops with UK experts and developing an economic modelling tool for TPP requirements. 129 individuals contributed (academics, funders, healthcare professionals, industry, policy, regulatory and HTA experts, health economists, and patient and public voice).

Results

Establishing specifications for combinations of core features driving a test’s value is key to TPP development. Trade-offs between different requirements must be considered. Relevant features types fall into 9 categories (e.g. unmet need, analytical performance, clinical validity, clinical utility, human factors, infrastructure, cost/economic, regulation, environmental). Fit-for-purpose TPPs require input from diverse stakeholders through desk research, consultation and modelling methods. TPP development has 2 stages: inception (establishing core working group, governance, action plan) and implementation (scoping unmet need and key test requirements, TPP drafting, consensus building).

Conclusions

This internationally-relevant, tumour-site agnostic guide is an evidence-based resource for designing TPPs for specific cancer tests and use cases. It highlights multifaceted factors and practical tips for deciding which features to consider and methods to use in TPP development. Robust TPPs are an important tool for developing improved cancer diagnostic tests, but need to align with wider innovation and health system efforts.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

RAND Europe; Cancer Research UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.