Abstract 1181P
Background
Diagnosing cancer earlier can support timely treatment and improve patient prognosis. Innovative diagnostic tests need to appropriately respond to unmet needs. Target Product Profiles (TPPs) are specification documents that serve as demand-signalling tools to inform developing improved tests – in terms of scientific performance, fit with clinical pathways and patient needs. There is growing interest in their use. Commissioned by Cancer Research UK, RAND Europe and the Office of Health Economics conducted a study to establish a methodological process for developing robust diagnostic TPPs for cancer and identify the types of features TPPs should consider.
Methods
A mixed-methods approach combined international literature review, interviews, workshops with UK experts and developing an economic modelling tool for TPP requirements. 129 individuals contributed (academics, funders, healthcare professionals, industry, policy, regulatory and HTA experts, health economists, and patient and public voice).
Results
Establishing specifications for combinations of core features driving a test’s value is key to TPP development. Trade-offs between different requirements must be considered. Relevant features types fall into 9 categories (e.g. unmet need, analytical performance, clinical validity, clinical utility, human factors, infrastructure, cost/economic, regulation, environmental). Fit-for-purpose TPPs require input from diverse stakeholders through desk research, consultation and modelling methods. TPP development has 2 stages: inception (establishing core working group, governance, action plan) and implementation (scoping unmet need and key test requirements, TPP drafting, consensus building).
Conclusions
This internationally-relevant, tumour-site agnostic guide is an evidence-based resource for designing TPPs for specific cancer tests and use cases. It highlights multifaceted factors and practical tips for deciding which features to consider and methods to use in TPP development. Robust TPPs are an important tool for developing improved cancer diagnostic tests, but need to align with wider innovation and health system efforts.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
RAND Europe; Cancer Research UK.
Funding
Cancer Research UK.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
212P - BRGSF-HIS mice as a predictive tool for safety assessment of biologics
Presenter: Kader Thiam
Session: Poster session 09
213P - Constructing a high-definition patient-digital twin (PDT) in treatment-naïve women with advanced cancer
Presenter: Leonardo Garma
Session: Poster session 09
215P - Detection of MUTYH for the prognosis and chemotherapy responsiveness of patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Chi Wai Wong
Session: Poster session 09
216P - β-catenin is a potential prognostic biomarker in uterine sarcoma
Presenter: Ying Cai
Session: Poster session 09
218P - Exploiting a unique glycosaminoglycan for novel pan-cancer therapies and diagnostics
Presenter: Mette Agerbæk
Session: Poster session 09
219P - The landscape and prognostic impact of germline HLA-A subtypes in patients with advanced solid cancers
Presenter: Kyrillus Shohdy
Session: Poster session 09
220P - The role of fucosyltransferase 1 (FUT1) in CRC as a putative prognostic and predictive biomarker
Presenter: Lorenz Pammer
Session: Poster session 09
221P - ANGPTL4's role in cancer: A meta analysis and bioinformatics exploration
Presenter: Osama Younis
Session: Poster session 09
222P - Artificial intelligence (AI) based prognostication from baseline computed tomography (CT) scans in a phase III advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) trial
Presenter: Omar Khan
Session: Poster session 09