Abstract 962P
Background
Multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) are key in the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) care pathway. They leverage the diverse member expertise to achieve better treatment decisions and patient outcomes compared to a single discipline without peer-discussion. MDTs drive earlier treatment initiation and improved guideline concordant care, positively impacting survival outcomes. Despite their common objective, the constitution and operations of HCC MDTs are variable across hospitals and regions, which may lead to sub-optimal outcomes, such as inconsistencies from numbers of patients treated to survival rates. The previously published framework by the MDT Aid Program (MAP) was used to gather best practices and perceived impact of HCC MDTs.
Methods
Over 130 semi-structured interviews were conducted with MDT members from 24 hospitals across Europe, Canada, US and China. A questionnaire was used to assess MDT member’s perceived impact of HCC MDTs on: MDT status quo (team composition, process), patient pathway (scale, time) and qualitative impact (patient outcomes, cost). Best practices and perceived impact were then pressure tested with 24 working groups within respective hospitals, and a cross-country panel of international HCC experts in a knowledge exchange session.
Results
We obtained 3 sets of results: (1) an optimal HCC MDT structure reflecting the dimensions stated above, (2) 40+ best practices encompassing patient access, MDT operations, technology utilisation, medical practice quality, team capabilities, and (3) insights on MDT members’ perception on the impact of HCC MDTs on patient outcomes and satisfaction. With this, hospital gaps were identified and matched to actionable best practices ready for implementation.
Conclusions
This is the first study to provide insights into specific HCC MDTs ways of working and recommended best practices. This can improve how MDTs are organized and managed globally, ultimately improving patient outcomes. The account of MDT members’ perceived impact of HCC MDTs will be used to inform the design of a real-world evidence study, aiming to quantitatively assess HCC MDTs impact on patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilisation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AstraZeneca.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
M.T. Campos Partera: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. A. Vogel: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Mannheim, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier, Tyra, Tahio; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member: Roche, MSD, BeiGene, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicines. G. Sapisochin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Roche, HeparRegeniX; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Integra, Chiesi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Research study: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Amgen, CVS Health, Gilead, J&J, Merck, Pfizer, UnitedHealth; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Roche, Stryker. A. Digklia: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. G.E. Villadsen: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sirtex C. Schnatwinkel: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Ipsen. L. Turner: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. W. Vereecken: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Merck. A. Moucquot: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer, Moderna. H. Naqvi: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Lily, GE, IBM. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1165P - The significance and indications for lymphadenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
Presenter: Yosuke Uematsu
Session: Poster session 17
1166P - 21-day modified CAPTEM protocol is effective and safe for patients with advanced well-differentiated grade 1/2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Presenter: Nomi Bezalel Engelberg
Session: Poster session 17
1167P - Outcomes of local and systemic treatment in primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PHNEN)
Presenter: Leonidas Apostolidis
Session: Poster session 17
1169P - Clustering of patients with lung neuroendocrine neoplasms using machine learning and its association with survival: A population based study from the U.S. SEER database
Presenter: Mohamed Mortagy
Session: Poster session 17
1170P - Convergent and divergent determinants of heterogeneity, biomarkers, and plasticity in thoracic and prostate neuroendocrine tumors
Presenter: Triparna Sen
Session: Poster session 17
Resources:
Abstract
1403P - A phase II study of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for surgically resectable esophageal cancer: Long-term follow-up outcomes of TD-NICE
Presenter: Tao Jiang
Session: Poster session 17
1404P - Predictive role of circulating cytokines in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD1 inhibitor: Pooled analyses of two phase II clinical trials
Presenter: Baoqing Chen
Session: Poster session 17
1405P - Long-term survival and post-hoc analysis of toripalimab plus definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EC-CRT-001 phase II trial)
Presenter: Ruixi Wang
Session: Poster session 17
Resources:
Abstract
1406P - Interim response evaluation from a phase II study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and anti-PD-1 in dMMR esophagogastric cancer (AuspiCiOus trial)
Presenter: Joris Bos
Session: Poster session 17