Abstract 962P
Background
Multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) are key in the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) care pathway. They leverage the diverse member expertise to achieve better treatment decisions and patient outcomes compared to a single discipline without peer-discussion. MDTs drive earlier treatment initiation and improved guideline concordant care, positively impacting survival outcomes. Despite their common objective, the constitution and operations of HCC MDTs are variable across hospitals and regions, which may lead to sub-optimal outcomes, such as inconsistencies from numbers of patients treated to survival rates. The previously published framework by the MDT Aid Program (MAP) was used to gather best practices and perceived impact of HCC MDTs.
Methods
Over 130 semi-structured interviews were conducted with MDT members from 24 hospitals across Europe, Canada, US and China. A questionnaire was used to assess MDT member’s perceived impact of HCC MDTs on: MDT status quo (team composition, process), patient pathway (scale, time) and qualitative impact (patient outcomes, cost). Best practices and perceived impact were then pressure tested with 24 working groups within respective hospitals, and a cross-country panel of international HCC experts in a knowledge exchange session.
Results
We obtained 3 sets of results: (1) an optimal HCC MDT structure reflecting the dimensions stated above, (2) 40+ best practices encompassing patient access, MDT operations, technology utilisation, medical practice quality, team capabilities, and (3) insights on MDT members’ perception on the impact of HCC MDTs on patient outcomes and satisfaction. With this, hospital gaps were identified and matched to actionable best practices ready for implementation.
Conclusions
This is the first study to provide insights into specific HCC MDTs ways of working and recommended best practices. This can improve how MDTs are organized and managed globally, ultimately improving patient outcomes. The account of MDT members’ perceived impact of HCC MDTs will be used to inform the design of a real-world evidence study, aiming to quantitatively assess HCC MDTs impact on patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilisation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AstraZeneca.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
M.T. Campos Partera: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. A. Vogel: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Mannheim, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier, Tyra, Tahio; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member: Roche, MSD, BeiGene, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicines. G. Sapisochin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Roche, HeparRegeniX; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Integra, Chiesi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Research study: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Amgen, CVS Health, Gilead, J&J, Merck, Pfizer, UnitedHealth; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Roche, Stryker. A. Digklia: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. G.E. Villadsen: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sirtex C. Schnatwinkel: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Ipsen. L. Turner: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. W. Vereecken: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Merck. A. Moucquot: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer, Moderna. H. Naqvi: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Lily, GE, IBM. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1156P - The efficacy of lower doses of everolimus in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors
Presenter: Rachel Riechelmann
Session: Poster session 17
1157P - Retreatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients (p) with neuroendocrine tumors (NET): Spanish clinical experience from SEPTRALU national registry
Presenter: Jorge Hernando Cubero
Session: Poster session 17
1158P - A novel nomogram for predicting overall survival of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors treated with PRRT
Presenter: Dimitrios Papantoniou
Session: Poster session 17
1159P - Molecular characterization of extra-pulmonary mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomas: The NIRVANA substudy
Presenter: Francesca Spada
Session: Poster session 17
1160P - An Italian multicenter phase II trial of metronomic temozolomide in unfit patients with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms: Interim analysis of the MeTe study
Presenter: Francesca Spada
Session: Poster session 17
1161P - Progression-free survival ratio and the implications for treatment sequencing in neuroendocrine neoplasms
Presenter: Philipp Melhorn
Session: Poster session 17
1162P - Transcriptomic analysis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours with carcinoid syndrome
Presenter: Javier Pozas Perez
Session: Poster session 17
1163P - Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory index (SII) in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)
Presenter: Eduardo Terán Brage
Session: Poster session 17
1164P - The influence of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on surgical management and prognostic outcomes in locally advanced rectal neuroendocrine carcinoma
Presenter: Weiran Xu
Session: Poster session 17