Abstract 962P
Background
Multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) are key in the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) care pathway. They leverage the diverse member expertise to achieve better treatment decisions and patient outcomes compared to a single discipline without peer-discussion. MDTs drive earlier treatment initiation and improved guideline concordant care, positively impacting survival outcomes. Despite their common objective, the constitution and operations of HCC MDTs are variable across hospitals and regions, which may lead to sub-optimal outcomes, such as inconsistencies from numbers of patients treated to survival rates. The previously published framework by the MDT Aid Program (MAP) was used to gather best practices and perceived impact of HCC MDTs.
Methods
Over 130 semi-structured interviews were conducted with MDT members from 24 hospitals across Europe, Canada, US and China. A questionnaire was used to assess MDT member’s perceived impact of HCC MDTs on: MDT status quo (team composition, process), patient pathway (scale, time) and qualitative impact (patient outcomes, cost). Best practices and perceived impact were then pressure tested with 24 working groups within respective hospitals, and a cross-country panel of international HCC experts in a knowledge exchange session.
Results
We obtained 3 sets of results: (1) an optimal HCC MDT structure reflecting the dimensions stated above, (2) 40+ best practices encompassing patient access, MDT operations, technology utilisation, medical practice quality, team capabilities, and (3) insights on MDT members’ perception on the impact of HCC MDTs on patient outcomes and satisfaction. With this, hospital gaps were identified and matched to actionable best practices ready for implementation.
Conclusions
This is the first study to provide insights into specific HCC MDTs ways of working and recommended best practices. This can improve how MDTs are organized and managed globally, ultimately improving patient outcomes. The account of MDT members’ perceived impact of HCC MDTs will be used to inform the design of a real-world evidence study, aiming to quantitatively assess HCC MDTs impact on patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilisation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AstraZeneca.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
M.T. Campos Partera: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. A. Vogel: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Mannheim, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier, Tyra, Tahio; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member: Roche, MSD, BeiGene, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicines. G. Sapisochin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Roche, HeparRegeniX; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Integra, Chiesi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Research study: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Amgen, CVS Health, Gilead, J&J, Merck, Pfizer, UnitedHealth; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Roche, Stryker. A. Digklia: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. G.E. Villadsen: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sirtex C. Schnatwinkel: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Ipsen. L. Turner: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. W. Vereecken: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Merck. A. Moucquot: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer, Moderna. H. Naqvi: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Lily, GE, IBM. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1417P - Comparative efficacy and safety of tislelizumab versus anti-PD-1 treatments in second-line esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Simulated treatment comparisons
Presenter: Elizabeth Smyth
Session: Poster session 17
1418P - Tumor microenvironment B-cell abundance and survival in resectable gastric cancer: A translational analysis from the CLASSIC trial
Presenter: Manavi Sachdeva
Session: Poster session 17
1419P - Osemitamab (TST001) plus nivolumab and CAPOX as the first-line therapy for the patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer (TranStar102)
Presenter: Lin Shen
Session: Poster session 17
1420P - Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 isoform IIIb (FGFR2b) protein overexpression and biomarker overlap in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC)
Presenter: Seiya Sato
Session: Poster session 17
1421P - Final results of the phase II trial of HER-Vaxx, a B-cell peptide-based vaccine plus standard care of chemotherapy in patients with HER2-overexpressing advanced gastric cancer - (HERIZON)
Presenter: Joshua Tobias
Session: Poster session 17
1422P - First-line rilvegostomig (rilve) + chemotherapy (CTx) in patients (pts) with HER2-negative (HER2–) locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric cancers: First report of GEMINI-Gastric sub study 2
Presenter: Fernando Rivera Herrero
Session: Poster session 17
1423P - Zanidatamab + chemotherapy for first-line (1L) treatment of HER2+ advanced or metastatic gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEA): New and updated data from a phase II trial
Presenter: Elena Elimova
Session: Poster session 17
1424P - Maintenance capecitabine plus ramucirumab after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (OGA): Final analysis from the PLATFORM trial
Presenter: Anderley Gordon
Session: Poster session 17
1426P - BL-B01D1, an EGFR x her3 bispecific antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Liu Chang
Session: Poster session 17