Abstract 962P
Background
Multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) are key in the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) care pathway. They leverage the diverse member expertise to achieve better treatment decisions and patient outcomes compared to a single discipline without peer-discussion. MDTs drive earlier treatment initiation and improved guideline concordant care, positively impacting survival outcomes. Despite their common objective, the constitution and operations of HCC MDTs are variable across hospitals and regions, which may lead to sub-optimal outcomes, such as inconsistencies from numbers of patients treated to survival rates. The previously published framework by the MDT Aid Program (MAP) was used to gather best practices and perceived impact of HCC MDTs.
Methods
Over 130 semi-structured interviews were conducted with MDT members from 24 hospitals across Europe, Canada, US and China. A questionnaire was used to assess MDT member’s perceived impact of HCC MDTs on: MDT status quo (team composition, process), patient pathway (scale, time) and qualitative impact (patient outcomes, cost). Best practices and perceived impact were then pressure tested with 24 working groups within respective hospitals, and a cross-country panel of international HCC experts in a knowledge exchange session.
Results
We obtained 3 sets of results: (1) an optimal HCC MDT structure reflecting the dimensions stated above, (2) 40+ best practices encompassing patient access, MDT operations, technology utilisation, medical practice quality, team capabilities, and (3) insights on MDT members’ perception on the impact of HCC MDTs on patient outcomes and satisfaction. With this, hospital gaps were identified and matched to actionable best practices ready for implementation.
Conclusions
This is the first study to provide insights into specific HCC MDTs ways of working and recommended best practices. This can improve how MDTs are organized and managed globally, ultimately improving patient outcomes. The account of MDT members’ perceived impact of HCC MDTs will be used to inform the design of a real-world evidence study, aiming to quantitatively assess HCC MDTs impact on patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilisation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AstraZeneca.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
M.T. Campos Partera: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. A. Vogel: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Mannheim, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier, Tyra, Tahio; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, Eisai, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member: Roche, MSD, BeiGene, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicines. G. Sapisochin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Roche, HeparRegeniX; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Integra, Chiesi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Research study: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Amgen, CVS Health, Gilead, J&J, Merck, Pfizer, UnitedHealth; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Roche, Stryker. A. Digklia: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca. G.E. Villadsen: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sirtex C. Schnatwinkel: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Ipsen. L. Turner: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. W. Vereecken: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Merck. A. Moucquot: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pfizer, Moderna. H. Naqvi: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Lily, GE, IBM. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
951P - CA19-9-related macrophage polarization has prognostic value in patients with HCC after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment
Presenter: Meiyan Zhu
Session: Poster session 17
952P - Comprehensive analysis of cytokines and PDL1 before and after administration of atezolizumab and bevasizumab in patients with HCC
Presenter: Kyoji Ito
Session: Poster session 17
953P - Vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC): A promising prognostic predictor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immunotherapy combinations
Presenter: Yanjiang Yin
Session: Poster session 17
954P - Evaluation of antigen-specific CD8 T cell responses to predict efficacy of atezolizumab and bevacizumab treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Angélique Vienot
Session: Poster session 17
957P - Modelling immune-mediated cytotoxicity for HCC with patient-derived organoid co-culture platform
Presenter: Tsz Tung Kwong
Session: Poster session 17
958P - Utilizing personalized tumor-specific methylation haplotypes of circulating tumor DNA for monitoring minimal residual disease in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after curative resection
Presenter: Xinrong Yang
Session: Poster session 17
959P - Machine learning-based MRI radiomics predicts overall survival of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization plus PD-(L)1 inhibitors and molecular targeted therapy
Presenter: Bin-Yan Zhong
Session: Poster session 17
960P - Development and validation of a novel digital PCR assay targeting circulating tumor DNA methylation biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma screening
Presenter: Hee-Jung Wang
Session: Poster session 17