Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 17

1406P - Interim response evaluation from a phase II study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and anti-PD-1 in dMMR esophagogastric cancer (AuspiCiOus trial)

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 17

Topics

Clinical Research;  Cytotoxic Therapy;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer;  Gastro-Oesophageal Junction Cancer

Presenters

Joris Bos

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S878-S912. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1603

Authors

J. Bos1, K. Brugman1, R. Bennink2, L. Verhoeven3, H. Westdorp4, G. Creemers5, N. Haj Mohammad6, S. Derks1, H.W.M. van Laarhoven1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, locatie VUmc, 1081 HZ - Amsterdam/NL
  • 2 Radiology And Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, locatie VUmc, 1081 HZ - Amsterdam/NL
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Laurentius Hospital, 6043CV - Roermond/NL
  • 4 Medical Oncology And Tumor Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA - Nijmegen/NL
  • 5 Medical Oncology Department, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, 5602 ZA - Eindhoven/NL
  • 6 Medical Oncology, UMC - University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA - Utrecht/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1406P

Background

Doublet cytotoxic treatment demonstrates survival benefit over single drug therapies in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer (EGC). However, reports on the effects of cytotoxic treatment in dMMR tumors range from beneficial to detrimental. Thus, the value of cytotoxic treatment in dMMR tumors is unclear. Here we aim to evaluate the efficacy of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CapOx) followed by retifanlimab in dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.

Methods

AuspiCiOus is a multi-center, open-label, single arm (phase 2) study in patients with dMMR irresectable or metastatic EGC adenocarcinoma (NCT05177133). Patients are treated with CapOx for two 3-weekly cycles, after which treatment is continued with retifanlimab for 4-weekly cycles up to progression or unacceptable toxicity, with a maximum of two years. Tumor response is determined according to (i)RECIST 1.1 after chemotherapy, two cycles of immunotherapy, and every three months thereafter.

Results

In this interim assessment, 19 patients have started treatment with CapOx. Six patients showed a partial response after CapOx treatment, and twelve patients showed a stable disease (see table). Nine out of 12 patients with tumor shrinkage on chemotherapy showed further tumor shrinkage after two cycles of anti-PD-1 (aPD-1). Six patients showed continued response on subsequent aPD-1. However, four patients showed progressive disease before two cycles of retifanlimab were completed. Table: 1406P

< -30% -30%–0% 0-20% PD iUPD NT
Two cycles of CapOx 6 9 2 1 1
Two cycles of aPD-1 8 5 3 1 1
Five cycles of aPD-1 6 2 1 1 1
Eight cycles of aPD-1 6 1 1 1

PD: Progressive Disease; iUPD: Unconfirmed Progressive Disease; NT: Non-target lesions only

Conclusions

The interim results demonstrated tumor response to CapOx in a substantial number of MSI tumors. However, some MSI tumors have a poor prognosis and show rapid disease progression within three months after start of treatment, despite chemotherapy or checkpoint inhibition.

Clinical trial identification

NCT05177133.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Amsterdam UMC.

Funding

Incyte.

Disclosure

S. Derks: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, sponsoring investigator initiated study: Incyte. H.W.M. van Laarhoven: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Astellas, BeiGene, Benecke, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, JAAP, Medtlaks, Novartis, Springer, Travel Congress Management BV; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Amphera, Anocca, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Dragonfly, MSD, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Advices on protocol development: Myeloid; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Selection of articles for Framingham: Framingham; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, LyRICX study: Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, TAPESTRY study: Merck; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, AUSPICIOUS study: Incyte; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, LOAD study: ORCA; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Auristone; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, DESTINY-GASTRIC03: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role, Chair upper GI Faculty: ESMO; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Product Samples, For all clinical study mentioned, study medication is provided: See 'research funding'. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.