Abstract 1706P
Background
The Accelerated Approval (AA) pathway was established to speed development and approval of drugs for life-threatening conditions with limited treatment options. In December 2022, the US Congress enacted new policies to ensure that confirmatory studies for AA medicines are completed in a timely fashion. Here, we evaluate factors associated with conversion of AA to regular approval by the US FDA, including magnitude of clinical benefit as measured by European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).
Methods
We included all anticancer drugs that had received AA from the US FDA from 1992 to 2020, with follow up on approval status through January 2022. FDA drug labels and clinical trial reports were reviewed to apply ESMO-MCBS v1.1 grades to both initial and confirmatory studies. High clinical benefit was defined as a grade of A or B for trials of curative intent and 4 or 5 for those of palliative intent. Withdrawn AA indications, as determined by FDA, were considered as low benefit.
Results
From 1992 to 2020, the FDA granted AA to 46 anticancer solid drugs for 74 indications. The median time between AA and regular approval of oncology drugs was 3.7 years (range: 0.8-12.6 years). Of these 74 indications, 42 (57%) had clinical benefit confirmed in post-approval clinical trials and were converted to regular approval. Indications with high clinical benefit according to ESMO-MCBS were associated with shorter times to conversion to regular approval (median 2.5 vs 4.8 years; P=0.007). Similarly, indications with overall survival benefit were associated with shorter times to regular approval (median 2.6 vs 3.7 years; P=0.04).
Conclusions
Anticancer medicines with greater clinical benefit were associated with faster conversion to full FDA approval. New policy reforms to the AA pathway in the USA should prioritize further expediting market access of therapies with high clinical benefit as well as expedited completion of confirmatory studies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1707P - Cancer drug prices in the US: Efficacy, innovation, clinical trial evidence, and epidemiology
Presenter: Christoph Michaeli
Session: Poster session 23
1708P - The registration pathways in China for globally developed novel anticancer drugs
Presenter: Da-wei Wu
Session: Poster session 23
1709P - Influence of censoring on conclusions of FDA-approved cancer drugs using the modified time to treatment failure
Presenter: Jonathan Ofer
Session: Poster session 23
1710P - Protocol waivers and consequences on treatment safety and efficacy in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP)
Presenter: Laurien Zeverijn
Session: Poster session 23
1711P - The DRUP-like clinical trials family: A distributed European trial network for equitable access to precision medicine
Presenter: Hans Gelderblom
Session: Poster session 23
1712P - Implementation of a molecular pre-screening program (MPP) in a network of public cancer centres for phase I clinical trial (Ph1-CT) candidates: The PREICO program
Presenter: Juan José Soto Castillo
Session: Poster session 23
1713P - Non-inferiority oncology clinical trials in major journals: Purposes, methods and results
Presenter: Rafael Barreto
Session: Poster session 23
1714P - Geographical disparities in access to cancer clinical trials in Korea
Presenter: Sokbom Kang
Session: Poster session 23
1715P - Analysis of the adequacy of control arms in oncology randomized clinical trials published between 2017 and 2021: A meta-research study
Presenter: Alessandro Rossi
Session: Poster session 23
1716P - Addressing clinical trial disparities in Spain: A digital solution
Presenter: Max Hardy-Werbin
Session: Poster session 23