Abstract 1706P
Background
The Accelerated Approval (AA) pathway was established to speed development and approval of drugs for life-threatening conditions with limited treatment options. In December 2022, the US Congress enacted new policies to ensure that confirmatory studies for AA medicines are completed in a timely fashion. Here, we evaluate factors associated with conversion of AA to regular approval by the US FDA, including magnitude of clinical benefit as measured by European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).
Methods
We included all anticancer drugs that had received AA from the US FDA from 1992 to 2020, with follow up on approval status through January 2022. FDA drug labels and clinical trial reports were reviewed to apply ESMO-MCBS v1.1 grades to both initial and confirmatory studies. High clinical benefit was defined as a grade of A or B for trials of curative intent and 4 or 5 for those of palliative intent. Withdrawn AA indications, as determined by FDA, were considered as low benefit.
Results
From 1992 to 2020, the FDA granted AA to 46 anticancer solid drugs for 74 indications. The median time between AA and regular approval of oncology drugs was 3.7 years (range: 0.8-12.6 years). Of these 74 indications, 42 (57%) had clinical benefit confirmed in post-approval clinical trials and were converted to regular approval. Indications with high clinical benefit according to ESMO-MCBS were associated with shorter times to conversion to regular approval (median 2.5 vs 4.8 years; P=0.007). Similarly, indications with overall survival benefit were associated with shorter times to regular approval (median 2.6 vs 3.7 years; P=0.04).
Conclusions
Anticancer medicines with greater clinical benefit were associated with faster conversion to full FDA approval. New policy reforms to the AA pathway in the USA should prioritize further expediting market access of therapies with high clinical benefit as well as expedited completion of confirmatory studies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1737P - Use of the predictive risk model LungFlagTM for lung cancer screening in screening in a Spanish reference center: A cost-effectiveness analysis
Presenter: Maria Eugenia Olmedo Garcia
Session: Poster session 23
1738P - Impact of digital platforms on exposure to tobacco and new smoking devices: A survey approach
Presenter: Diego de Haro
Session: Poster session 23
1739P - Lung cancer mortality patterns of tobacco users in the United States: A 21-year analysis (1999-2020)
Presenter: Seif Bugazia
Session: Poster session 23
1740P - Geolocation of respiratory tract cancer and its relationship with chronic exposure to PM2.5 pollutants
Presenter: Moisés González-Escamilla
Session: Poster session 23
1741P - Are physicians aware of lung cancer screening benefits and the importance of implementing this? Data from two public hospitals in Buenos Aires province, Argentina
Presenter: Valentin Vidal
Session: Poster session 23
1742P - Gender differences in incidence trends of early-onset GI cancer: The European perspective
Presenter: Irit Ben-Aharon
Session: Poster session 23
1743P - Bridging the gender gap in oncology: GEORGiNA'S quest for equality in academic research
Presenter: Khalid El Bairi
Session: Poster session 23
1744P - Socioeconomic inequalities in the diagnosis and treatment of colon cancer: A population-based English cancer registry study
Presenter: Benjamin Pickwell-Smith
Session: Poster session 23
1745P - Why do adult patients with cancer abandon treatment in India? A nationwide qualitative study to understand the perspectives of healthcare workers
Presenter: Reshma Ayiraveetil
Session: Poster session 23
1746P - Unintended consequences: Working time directives and oncology staff implications
Presenter: Simon Barry
Session: Poster session 23