Abstract 1706P
Background
The Accelerated Approval (AA) pathway was established to speed development and approval of drugs for life-threatening conditions with limited treatment options. In December 2022, the US Congress enacted new policies to ensure that confirmatory studies for AA medicines are completed in a timely fashion. Here, we evaluate factors associated with conversion of AA to regular approval by the US FDA, including magnitude of clinical benefit as measured by European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).
Methods
We included all anticancer drugs that had received AA from the US FDA from 1992 to 2020, with follow up on approval status through January 2022. FDA drug labels and clinical trial reports were reviewed to apply ESMO-MCBS v1.1 grades to both initial and confirmatory studies. High clinical benefit was defined as a grade of A or B for trials of curative intent and 4 or 5 for those of palliative intent. Withdrawn AA indications, as determined by FDA, were considered as low benefit.
Results
From 1992 to 2020, the FDA granted AA to 46 anticancer solid drugs for 74 indications. The median time between AA and regular approval of oncology drugs was 3.7 years (range: 0.8-12.6 years). Of these 74 indications, 42 (57%) had clinical benefit confirmed in post-approval clinical trials and were converted to regular approval. Indications with high clinical benefit according to ESMO-MCBS were associated with shorter times to conversion to regular approval (median 2.5 vs 4.8 years; P=0.007). Similarly, indications with overall survival benefit were associated with shorter times to regular approval (median 2.6 vs 3.7 years; P=0.04).
Conclusions
Anticancer medicines with greater clinical benefit were associated with faster conversion to full FDA approval. New policy reforms to the AA pathway in the USA should prioritize further expediting market access of therapies with high clinical benefit as well as expedited completion of confirmatory studies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1757P - A real-world evaluation of the effectiveness of thermogram along with clinical breast examination in community-based breast cancer screening program
Presenter: Rahul Ravind
Session: Poster session 23
1758P - Body composition meets precision medicine: The prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients (pt) treated with Molecularly Targeted Agents (MTA)
Presenter: Cinta Hierro
Session: Poster session 23
1760P - Systematic review of quality of life (QoL) inclusion among endpoints, reporting and impact of QoL results in phase III non-inferiority trials of systemic treatments in oncology
Presenter: Jessica Paparo
Session: Poster session 23
1761P - Incidence of herpes zoster in cancer patients in Europe: A systematic review
Presenter: Inga Posiuniene
Session: Poster session 23
1762P - Are published data up-to-date? Analysis of time to publication in major oncological journals
Presenter: Pawel Sobczuk
Session: Poster session 23
1763P - The challenge for Cancer Trials Ireland (CTI) to sponsor NCI and non-EU sponsored trials in the EU
Presenter: Eibhlin Mulroe
Session: Poster session 23
1886P - Pembrolizumab and denosumab in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): A phase II trial (KeyPAD, ANZUP1601)
Presenter: Craig Gedye
Session: Poster session 23
1887P - Adjuvant everolimus (EVE) in patients (pts) with completely resected very high-risk renal cell cancer (RCC) and clear cell histology: Results from the phase III SWOG S0931 (EVEREST) trial
Presenter: Primo Lara
Session: Poster session 23
1888P - 24-month follow up of durvalumab and savolitinib combination in MET-driven clear cell and non-clear cell renal cancer
Presenter: Francesca Jackson-Spence
Session: Poster session 23