Abstract 1706P
Background
The Accelerated Approval (AA) pathway was established to speed development and approval of drugs for life-threatening conditions with limited treatment options. In December 2022, the US Congress enacted new policies to ensure that confirmatory studies for AA medicines are completed in a timely fashion. Here, we evaluate factors associated with conversion of AA to regular approval by the US FDA, including magnitude of clinical benefit as measured by European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).
Methods
We included all anticancer drugs that had received AA from the US FDA from 1992 to 2020, with follow up on approval status through January 2022. FDA drug labels and clinical trial reports were reviewed to apply ESMO-MCBS v1.1 grades to both initial and confirmatory studies. High clinical benefit was defined as a grade of A or B for trials of curative intent and 4 or 5 for those of palliative intent. Withdrawn AA indications, as determined by FDA, were considered as low benefit.
Results
From 1992 to 2020, the FDA granted AA to 46 anticancer solid drugs for 74 indications. The median time between AA and regular approval of oncology drugs was 3.7 years (range: 0.8-12.6 years). Of these 74 indications, 42 (57%) had clinical benefit confirmed in post-approval clinical trials and were converted to regular approval. Indications with high clinical benefit according to ESMO-MCBS were associated with shorter times to conversion to regular approval (median 2.5 vs 4.8 years; P=0.007). Similarly, indications with overall survival benefit were associated with shorter times to regular approval (median 2.6 vs 3.7 years; P=0.04).
Conclusions
Anticancer medicines with greater clinical benefit were associated with faster conversion to full FDA approval. New policy reforms to the AA pathway in the USA should prioritize further expediting market access of therapies with high clinical benefit as well as expedited completion of confirmatory studies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1717P - Management of patients during a digital healthcare record system transition: A phase I unit experience
Presenter: Lyra Del Rosario
Session: Poster session 23
1718P - Impact of the economic status of the patient's country of residence on the outcome of oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Saki Nishiyama
Session: Poster session 23
1719P - Decentralized clinical trials: Is there a space in Italy?
Presenter: Celeste Cagnazzo
Session: Poster session 23
1720P - Experience in the provision of oncology services immediately after a major disaster
Presenter: Burak Aktas
Session: Poster session 23
1721P - Self-assessment tool and best-practice sharing to support hospitals in improving the quality of multi-disciplinary teams in lung cancer care
Presenter: Ernest Nadal
Session: Poster session 23
1722P - Factors contributing to differences in evidence compliance rate in cancer treatment among second opinion cases
Presenter: Tomomi Sanomachi
Session: Poster session 23
1723P - Improving access to molecular tumour boards for complex genomic profiles: A healthcare policy from the Netherlands
Presenter: Sahar van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani
Session: Poster session 23
1724P - Improving access to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment through navigation: Evaluation of a one-year pilot project in Botswana
Presenter: Ariane Migeotte
Session: Poster session 23
1725P - Genetic counselling for cancer in EU member states: Review and foundation for consensus recommendations
Presenter: J. Matt McCrary
Session: Poster session 23
1726P - Optimizing oncology drug spending in a cancer centre in Ireland
Presenter: Ruth Kieran
Session: Poster session 23