Abstract 1179P
Background
Recent reports have been shown an increased risk of de-novo malignancies in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) which is reported to be a leading cause of mortality in these patients. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence of skin cancer in LTRs.
Methods
We systematically searched in five databases till 20th April 2023 through the search term ("liver transplantation" OR "liver transplant") AND ("skin cancer" OR "melanoma" OR "squamous cell carcinoma" OR "non-melanoma skin cancer" OR "post-transplant cancer" OR "post transplant cancer"). We used random effect model to overcome the significant heterogeneity we observed.
Results
A total of 34 studies, with 147154 LTRs were included. The pooled prevalence of skin cancer (all types) was 4.8% (95%confidence interval (CI): 3.6-6.5). Subgroup analysis based upon the follow up duration of each study, indicated that skin cancer prevalence increased with long duration of follow up: 0-4 years, 2.4% (95%CI: 0.5-9.9), 4-8 years, 4.2% (95%CI 2.9-6.2), and >8 years, 7.6% (95%CI: 4.7-12). Australia followed by South America had the highest prevalence of skin cancer, 20.6% (95%CI: 12.9-31.3), and 9.4% (95%CI: 5.8-14.8), in order; while Asia had the lowest prevalence 0.4% (95%CI: 0-3.8). The most common type of skin cancers was non-melanoma skin cancer reported as a combined type with a prevalence of 2.9% (95%CI: 1.1-6.9), followed by squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma and Bowen’s cancer, 2.5% (95%CI: 1.4-4.4), 2.5% (95%CI: 1.5-4.1) and 0.8% (95%CI: 0.2-3.2), in order.
Conclusions
Consistent with what it has been reported for other organ transplants, the results from this study showed that skin cancer following liver transplantation is not rare. LTRs in Australia should receive annual dermatologic examination due to their high prevalence of skin cancers. Moreover, non-melanoma skin cancers may be the prevalent type if skin cancer is suspected in LTRs. Substantial dermatological surveillance programs are recommended in LTRs to improve quality of life as well as the associated mortality; especially with the increased prevalence after long follow up durations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1109P - Second-line pembrolizumab (pembro) in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Long-term follow-up of the phase I KEYNOTE-151 study
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster session 13
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13