Abstract 1179P
Background
Recent reports have been shown an increased risk of de-novo malignancies in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) which is reported to be a leading cause of mortality in these patients. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence of skin cancer in LTRs.
Methods
We systematically searched in five databases till 20th April 2023 through the search term ("liver transplantation" OR "liver transplant") AND ("skin cancer" OR "melanoma" OR "squamous cell carcinoma" OR "non-melanoma skin cancer" OR "post-transplant cancer" OR "post transplant cancer"). We used random effect model to overcome the significant heterogeneity we observed.
Results
A total of 34 studies, with 147154 LTRs were included. The pooled prevalence of skin cancer (all types) was 4.8% (95%confidence interval (CI): 3.6-6.5). Subgroup analysis based upon the follow up duration of each study, indicated that skin cancer prevalence increased with long duration of follow up: 0-4 years, 2.4% (95%CI: 0.5-9.9), 4-8 years, 4.2% (95%CI 2.9-6.2), and >8 years, 7.6% (95%CI: 4.7-12). Australia followed by South America had the highest prevalence of skin cancer, 20.6% (95%CI: 12.9-31.3), and 9.4% (95%CI: 5.8-14.8), in order; while Asia had the lowest prevalence 0.4% (95%CI: 0-3.8). The most common type of skin cancers was non-melanoma skin cancer reported as a combined type with a prevalence of 2.9% (95%CI: 1.1-6.9), followed by squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma and Bowen’s cancer, 2.5% (95%CI: 1.4-4.4), 2.5% (95%CI: 1.5-4.1) and 0.8% (95%CI: 0.2-3.2), in order.
Conclusions
Consistent with what it has been reported for other organ transplants, the results from this study showed that skin cancer following liver transplantation is not rare. LTRs in Australia should receive annual dermatologic examination due to their high prevalence of skin cancers. Moreover, non-melanoma skin cancers may be the prevalent type if skin cancer is suspected in LTRs. Substantial dermatological surveillance programs are recommended in LTRs to improve quality of life as well as the associated mortality; especially with the increased prevalence after long follow up durations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1198P - Phase Ib portion of the ACTION-1 phase Ib/3 trial of RYZ101 in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) progressing after 177Lu somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy: Safety and efficacy findings
Presenter: Jonathan Strosberg
Session: Poster session 13
1199P - MAVERIC: Phase II randomized study of everolimus as maintenance therapy for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (mNEN) with pulmonary or gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) origin. Results on behalf of the GOIRC
Presenter: Lorenzo Antonuzzo
Session: Poster session 13
1200P - A phase II single-arm interventional trial evaluating the activity and safety of CABOzantinib (CBZ) plus TEMozolomide (TMZ) in lung and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) progressed after SSA therapy, everolimus, sunitinib or PRRT: CABOTEM Trial
Presenter: oOttavia Clemente
Session: Poster session 13
1201P - Evaluation of efficacy TEMCAP regiment as first-line or further line therapy in patients with advanced, unresectable, progressive GEP-NET. Real-world data
Presenter: Agnieszka Kolasinska-Cwikla
Session: Poster session 13
1202P - Final analysis of TENEC trial: A phase II trial of temozolomide (TMZ) as second-line treatment for advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in patients (pts) with a poor performance status (PS)
Presenter: Claudia von Arx
Session: Poster session 13